Skip to content

8379867: C2 VectorAPI: Rename TypeVectMask -> TypePVectMask for clarity#30812

Closed
dev-jonghoonpark wants to merge 4 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
dev-jonghoonpark:JDK-8379867
Closed

8379867: C2 VectorAPI: Rename TypeVectMask -> TypePVectMask for clarity#30812
dev-jonghoonpark wants to merge 4 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
dev-jonghoonpark:JDK-8379867

Conversation

@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dev-jonghoonpark dev-jonghoonpark commented Apr 19, 2026

changes

  • Renamed TypeVectMask class to TypePVectMask.
  • Renamed accessor methods accordingly:
    • is_vectmask()is_pvectmask()
    • isa_vectmask()isa_pvectmask().

Test

  • Verified that make images completes without errors.
  • Confirmed that Tier1 tests pass successfully.
  • Confirmed that hotspot_vector_1 tests and jdk_vector tests pass successfully.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (2 reviews required, with at least 1 Reviewer, 1 Author)

Issue

  • JDK-8379867: C2 VectorAPI: Rename TypeVectMask -> TypePVectMask for clarity (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/30812/head:pull/30812
$ git checkout pull/30812

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/30812
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/30812/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 30812

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 30812

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30812.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Signed-off-by: jonghoonpark <dev@jonghoonpark.com>
@bridgekeeper
Copy link
Copy Markdown

bridgekeeper Bot commented Apr 19, 2026

👋 Welcome back dev-jonghoonpark! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Apr 19, 2026

@dev-jonghoonpark This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8379867: C2 VectorAPI: Rename TypeVectMask -> TypePVectMask for clarity

Reviewed-by: epeter, psandoz

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@eme64, @PaulSandoz) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 19, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Apr 19, 2026

@dev-jonghoonpark The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Apr 19, 2026

The total number of required reviews for this PR has been set to 2 based on the presence of this label: hotspot-compiler. This can be overridden with the /reviewers command.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 19, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mlbridge Bot commented Apr 19, 2026

Webrevs

@eme64
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

eme64 commented Apr 20, 2026

@dev-jonghoonpark Thanks for taking on this task. I'll run some internal sanity testing now...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing passed, change looks good!

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Apr 23, 2026

@dev-jonghoonpark this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout JDK-8379867
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Apr 23, 2026
# Conflicts:
#	src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86.ad
@openjdk openjdk Bot removed the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Apr 23, 2026
@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@eme64

Thank you for the review.
I've resolved the conflicts and merged the changes.

Do we need another reviewer on this?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@PaulSandoz PaulSandoz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, simple rename, and tests pass. Please merge master into this PR and recheck locally all is good before integrating since it's been a few days.

@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@PaulSandoz
Following your advice, I have merged the latest master and confirmed that the local tier1 tests pass without issues.

so I’ll proceed with the integration now.

@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented Apr 29, 2026

@dev-jonghoonpark This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It seems I need a re-review from @eme64 before I can proceed with /integrate.

Could you please take another look?

@dev-jonghoonpark dev-jonghoonpark requested a review from eme64 April 29, 2026 23:11
@eme64
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

eme64 commented Apr 30, 2026

Changes look good. I don't want to have to run testing again, and I think we could rely on GitHub actions testing. But it seems that is disabled, and only jcheck is running here. Can you please make sure that pre-submit tests are run?

@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dev-jonghoonpark commented Apr 30, 2026

Thank you for the advice. I wasn't aware of this approach until now.

The pre-submit tests are currently running, and I will share the results with you as soon as they are completed.
https://github.com/dev-jonghoonpark/jdk-forked/actions/runs/25185087543

@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@eme64 The pre-submit tests have completed successfully.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eme64 eme64 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks for enabling it! Ship it!

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 4, 2026
@dev-jonghoonpark
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label May 4, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented May 4, 2026

@dev-jonghoonpark
Your change (at version c237fe5) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@eme64
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

eme64 commented May 4, 2026

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented May 4, 2026

Going to push as commit 3ba94ae.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 4, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot closed this May 4, 2026
@openjdk openjdk Bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels May 4, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openjdk Bot commented May 4, 2026

@eme64 Pushed as commit 3ba94ae.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants