8382441: Problemlist TestStressAllocationGCEventsWithShenandoah and TestStressBigAllocationGCEventsWithShenandoah

[rgithubli]

Problemlist these two tests before coming up with a stable fix. Original test failure report: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8382335

---

• I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the OpenJDK Interim AI Policy.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8382441: Problemlist TestStressAllocationGCEventsWithShenandoah and TestStressBigAllocationGCEventsWithShenandoah (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

• William Kemper (@earthling-amzn - Reviewer)
• Aleksey Shipilev (@shipilev - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/30802/head:pull/30802
$ git checkout pull/30802

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/30802
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/30802/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 30802

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 30802

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30802.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back ruili! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@rgithubli This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8382441: Problemlist TestStressAllocationGCEventsWithShenandoah and TestStressBigAllocationGCEventsWithShenandoah

Reviewed-by: wkemper, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• d8e3813: 8382054: TestLoopPeelingDisabled.java fails with -DVerifyIR=false
• 9a3588b: 8379744: Add a way to update the key of a red-black tree node
• f65c177: 8365147: AArch64: Replace DMB + LD + DMB with LDAR for C1 volatile field loads
• ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e95beacb4c2655865f8e8b081ba5137ce9878b82...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@earthling-amzn, @shipilev) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

@rgithubli To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[rgithubli]

/label hotspot

[openjdk]

@rgithubli
The hotspot label was successfully added.

[openjdk]

The total number of required reviews for this PR has been set to 2 based on the presence of this label: hotspot. This can be overridden with the /reviewers command.

[earthling-amzn]

LGTM, thank you.

[earthling-amzn]

/reviewers 1

Trivial. Disables intermittently failing test.

[openjdk]

@earthling-amzn
The total number of required reviews for this PR (including the jcheck configuration and the last /reviewers command) is now set to 1 (with at least 1 Reviewer).

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (f3ea4f77)

[rgithubli]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@rgithubli Unknown command interate - for a list of valid commands use /help.

[rgithubli]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@rgithubli
Your change (at version f3ea4f7) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[shipilev]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit b854ba1.
Since your change was applied there have been 22 commits pushed to the master branch:

• d8e3813: 8382054: TestLoopPeelingDisabled.java fails with -DVerifyIR=false
• 9a3588b: 8379744: Add a way to update the key of a red-black tree node
• f65c177: 8365147: AArch64: Replace DMB + LD + DMB with LDAR for C1 volatile field loads
• ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e95beacb4c2655865f8e8b081ba5137ce9878b82...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@shipilev @rgithubli Pushed as commit b854ba1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.