fix(webhook): normalize endpoint URL before validation

[PrasunaEnumarthy]

Description

Normalize webhook --endpoint-url values before validating them in the non-interactive create and edit commands.
Other Harbor CLI commands normalize user-provided URLs using FormatUrl(...) before validation. Previously, webhook create/edit commands validated raw input directly, which could reject valid inputs like example.com/webhook that should be normalized to https://example.com/webhook.

• Fixes [bug]: Normalize webhook endpoint URL before validation in create/edit commands #799

Type of Change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Refactor
• Documentation update
• Chore / maintenance

Changes

• Normalize --endpoint-url using FormatUrl(...) before validation in webhook create
• Normalize --endpoint-url using FormatUrl(...) before validation in webhook edit
• Ensure consistent behavior with other Harbor CLI commands

[NucleoFusion]

lgtm
Thanks for the contribution

[bupd]

/lgtm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 8.89%. Comparing base (60ad0bd) to head (bd6840e).
⚠️ Report is 131 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #800      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   10.99%   8.89%   -2.10%     
=========================================
  Files         173     270      +97     
  Lines        8671   13169    +4498     
=========================================
+ Hits          953    1171     +218     
- Misses       7612   11880    +4268     
- Partials      106     118      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[bupd]

https://github.com/goharbor/harbor-cli/actions/runs/24009325611?pr=800

Ah, looks like there is linting issues @PrasunaEnumarthy - please fix the lint issues

Thanks for the contribution

[PrasunaEnumarthy]

@bupd @NucleoFusion
I’ve addressed the requested changes and added tests to cover the updates.
All checks related to this PR are now passing, and the modified lines are fully covered (codecov/patch is at 100%).

The only remaining failing check is codecov/project, which seems to be related to overall repository coverage rather than this change specifically. Happy to add more tests if needed.