Add ToLowerInvariant()/ToUpperInvariant() interceptor for .NET Framework

[andrewlock]

Summary of changes

Adds an interceptor that replaces all usages of string.ToLowerInvariant()/string.ToUpperInvariant() with StringUtil.ToLowerInvariant()/StringUtil.ToUpperInvariant()

Reason for change

On .NET Framework ToLowerInvariant() allocates, even if there's no change of case required. #9173 added a non-allocating version, but did not update call sites (there are about ~80 today in Datadog.Trace). With this interceptor, we don't have to touch any of those files (including the vendored code) or add the indirection for non-.NET Framework, and it covers new usages too.

Implementation details

• Create an interceptor that specifically looks for ToLowerInvariant() and ToUpperInvariant()
• Try to make it bail out asap in non-.NET Framework
  • Interceptors are much more expensive compile/IDE-wise than source generators.
  • There's no way to explicitly stop the generator running on .NET Core, unless we put it in its own project, which is pretty annoying
• Add [SkipStringCaseInterception] to allow opting out of the interception, e.g. on IAST we want to run exactly the method the customer requested

Test coverage

Added unit tests for the interceptor, and if you decompile the binary, you can see that the method is being intercepted as expected

Other details

Stacked on

• Add non-allocating ToLowerInvariant() / ToUpperInvariant() for .NET Framework #9173

Compare this approach to

• Use StringUtil.ToLowerInvariant()/StringUtil.ToUpperInvariant() on .NET Framework #9180

Only one of those approaches will be merged!

[andrewlock]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-04T10:06:12.178942Z	93324fa	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-04T10:08:05.149098Z	93324fa	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 93324fae0f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 93324fae0f

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

• You comment "@codex security review"
• A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

[dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot]

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9175) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-08 08:26:44

Comparing candidate commit 7603282 in PR branch andrew/tolowerinvariant-interceptor with baseline commit 018da89 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 71 known flaky benchmarks, 55 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

• 🟥 throughput [-4618.272op/s; -4401.518op/s] or [-5.272%; -5.025%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472

• 🟩 throughput [+10651.463op/s; +11769.902op/s] or [+5.713%; +6.312%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

• 🟩 throughput [+12111.022op/s; +13667.700op/s] or [+8.027%; +9.059%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472

• 🟩 throughput [+12522.963op/s; +13810.252op/s] or [+6.519%; +7.189%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472

• 🟩 throughput [+13030.789op/s; +14026.274op/s] or [+7.295%; +7.853%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

• 🟩 throughput [+9373.819op/s; +10360.139op/s] or [+6.559%; +7.249%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472

• 🟩 throughput [+19447.402op/s; +20483.657op/s] or [+11.660%; +12.281%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472

• 🟩 throughput [+12783.848op/s; +14053.583op/s] or [+7.156%; +7.867%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

• 🟥 throughput [-6349.240op/s; -5759.259op/s] or [-7.528%; -6.829%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 throughput [-9996.096op/s; -7127.999op/s] or [-10.164%; -7.248%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.605KB; +1.605KB] or [+48.760%; +48.776%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+311.907ms; +316.297ms] or [+154.779%; +156.958%]
• 🟥 throughput [-61.871op/s; -56.547op/s] or [-11.132%; -10.174%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.011KB; +1.011KB] or [+37.485%; +37.498%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+373.669ms; +376.253ms] or [+295.221%; +297.263%]
• 🟩 throughput [+68.933op/s; +73.200op/s] or [+9.089%; +9.651%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.090KB; +1.090KB] or [+40.417%; +40.429%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+394.249ms; +398.213ms] or [+348.895%; +352.403%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.726KB] or [+99.482%; +99.497%]
• 🟥 throughput [-60961.840op/s; -60424.508op/s] or [-47.431%; -47.013%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-16.057ms; -11.887ms] or [-7.499%; -5.551%]
• 🟥 throughput [-62619.815op/s; -59860.106op/s] or [-45.709%; -43.694%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
• 🟥 throughput [-48811.506op/s; -46562.163op/s] or [-44.131%; -42.098%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
• 🟥 throughput [-288681.441op/s; -284178.500op/s] or [-29.476%; -29.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-26.801ms; -21.915ms] or [-11.952%; -9.773%]
• 🟥 throughput [-91999.212op/s; -69079.341op/s] or [-9.828%; -7.380%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
• 🟥 throughput [-169085.330op/s; -152952.271op/s] or [-24.294%; -21.976%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
• 🟥 throughput [-72786.479op/s; -72014.861op/s] or [-48.984%; -48.465%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
• 🟥 throughput [-74749.347op/s; -71856.856op/s] or [-47.562%; -45.721%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
• 🟥 throughput [-56071.120op/s; -53439.982op/s] or [-44.668%; -42.572%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+310400.074op/s; +342096.559op/s] or [+10.350%; +11.407%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-18.943ms; -14.608ms] or [-8.732%; -6.734%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.489ms; +301.187ms] or [+150.144%; +150.493%]
• 🟩 throughput [+979.413op/s; +1020.793op/s] or [+10.818%; +11.275%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+299.819ms; +303.071ms] or [+151.200%; +152.839%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2212.552op/s; +2426.143op/s] or [+16.923%; +18.556%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.415ms; +302.919ms] or [+151.326%; +152.587%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1740.165op/s; +1867.894op/s] or [+16.800%; +18.034%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+297.517ms; +298.252ms] or [+146.128%; +146.490%]
• 🟩 throughput [+555.859op/s; +578.271op/s] or [+14.736%; +15.330%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+296.974ms; +299.339ms] or [+145.179%; +146.336%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2630.048op/s; +2700.661op/s] or [+38.210%; +39.236%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.730ms; +301.344ms] or [+150.305%; +150.611%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1401.164op/s; +1422.029op/s] or [+27.812%; +28.226%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-141.025µs; -134.399µs] or [-28.954%; -27.594%]
• 🟩 throughput [+787.174op/s; +836.631op/s] or [+38.339%; +40.748%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-120.546µs; -86.204µs] or [-27.647%; -19.771%]
• 🟩 throughput [+642.534op/s; +829.308op/s] or [+27.935%; +36.055%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-142.631µs; -120.629µs] or [-30.559%; -25.845%]
• 🟩 throughput [+776.812op/s; +859.770op/s] or [+35.859%; +39.689%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-126.408µs; -121.808µs] or [-34.129%; -32.887%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1334.049op/s; +1391.084op/s] or [+49.407%; +51.519%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-96.412µs; -72.755µs] or [-30.779%; -23.227%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1065.271op/s; +1269.482op/s] or [+33.208%; +39.573%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-137.958µs; -115.550µs] or [-37.740%; -31.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1333.151op/s; +1471.110op/s] or [+47.841%; +52.792%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.587ms; +300.404ms] or [+149.525%; +149.932%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+414.290ms; +420.947ms] or [+450.143%; +457.376%]
• 🟩 throughput [+829.934op/s; +995.428op/s] or [+6.820%; +8.180%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+293.509ms; +347.305ms] or [+222.859%; +263.705%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• unstable execution_time [+351.005ms; +417.980ms] or [+161.389%; +192.183%]
• 🟥 throughput [-543.820op/s; -488.939op/s] or [-49.275%; -44.303%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+140.160ms; +288.205ms] or [+59.730%; +122.821%]
• 🟥 throughput [-670.226op/s; -586.778op/s] or [-44.704%; -39.138%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+332.081ms; +343.185ms] or [+198.623%; +205.265%]
• 🟥 throughput [-395.313op/s; -359.214op/s] or [-27.525%; -25.012%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+30.649op/s; +51.187op/s] or [+6.050%; +10.105%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+303.102ms; +305.822ms] or [+152.636%; +154.006%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.979ms; +303.651ms] or [+151.322%; +152.160%]
• 🟩 throughput [+32148.818op/s; +37295.609op/s] or [+5.069%; +5.880%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+298.549ms; +303.091ms] or [+149.978%; +152.260%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.732ms; +302.254ms] or [+150.516%; +151.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.408ms; +301.182ms] or [+148.044%; +148.921%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+303.988ms; +308.554ms] or [+154.074%; +156.389%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.264ms; +303.658ms] or [+151.207%; +152.409%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.369ms; +303.811ms] or [+150.205%; +151.422%]
• 🟩 throughput [+49146.162op/s; +55693.961op/s] or [+9.759%; +11.059%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.625ms; +304.319ms] or [+149.558%; +151.396%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-15.772ms; -12.082ms] or [-7.334%; -5.618%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

• unstable execution_time [+9.459µs; +53.316µs] or [+2.336%; +13.169%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.586KB; -19.562KB] or [-7.145%; -7.136%]
• unstable execution_time [-30.571µs; +28.006µs] or [-6.042%; +5.535%]
• unstable throughput [-97.366op/s; +104.822op/s] or [-4.859%; +5.231%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-62.497µs; -0.460µs] or [-10.830%; -0.080%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+6.934µs; +10.933µs] or [+16.390%; +25.842%]
• 🟥 throughput [-5033.774op/s; -3246.668op/s] or [-21.191%; -13.667%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-14.476µs; -6.498µs] or [-22.458%; -10.082%]
• unstable throughput [+1688.535op/s; +3385.493op/s] or [+10.360%; +20.771%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.574ms; +303.772ms] or [+152.938%; +153.543%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.178ms; +304.539ms] or [+153.808%; +155.009%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.377ms; +301.524ms] or [+149.875%; +150.950%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+298.143ms; +300.969ms] or [+148.597%; +150.006%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.645ms; +302.761ms] or [+150.970%; +152.032%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.664ms; +305.072ms] or [+153.492%; +154.713%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.172ms; +299.930ms] or [+149.229%; +149.607%]
• 🟩 throughput [+61263960.041op/s; +61580862.099op/s] or [+44.616%; +44.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+416.442ms; +419.556ms] or [+517.919%; +521.792%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.665ms; +300.692ms] or [+149.466%; +149.978%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+66953.406op/s; +79448.077op/s] or [+6.251%; +7.418%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+49274.473op/s; +68311.969op/s] or [+5.703%; +7.907%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+79923.907op/s; +87136.421op/s] or [+7.938%; +8.654%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+24756.475op/s; +34446.049op/s] or [+5.541%; +7.710%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+67852.218op/s; +86193.570op/s] or [+7.581%; +9.630%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1