Docs: Add project structure page#5133
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
WalkthroughA new documentation guide page Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/src/content/docs/guides/dev/project-structure.mdx (1)
41-41: Small phrasing tweak for readability.Consider “the contents of
frontend/srcwill differ…” for cleaner grammar.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/src/content/docs/guides/dev/project-structure.mdx` at line 41, Update the sentence that currently reads "If you choose to use a different starter template, contents of `frontend/src` will differ depending on your chosen framework" to a smoother phrasing such as "If you choose a different starter template, the contents of `frontend/src` will differ depending on your chosen framework" (or "the contents of `frontend/src` will differ depending on which framework you choose"); locate the sentence referencing `frontend/src` and replace it with the revised wording to improve grammar and readability.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/src/content/docs/guides/dev/project-structure.mdx`:
- Line 8: The doc claims "Vanilla template" but the displayed tree uses
React+TypeScript artifacts; either update the heading text on line 8 to "React +
TypeScript template" or adjust the tree to match the Vanilla template by
replacing TypeScript/React items (vite.config.ts, tsconfig.json, React mention
in the frontend comment) with Vanilla equivalents (vite.config.js, remove
tsconfig.json, change frontend comment to plain JS). Make a single consistent
change so the heading and the listed files (vite.config.ts / vite.config.js,
tsconfig.json, frontend comment) reflect the same template.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/src/content/docs/guides/dev/project-structure.mdx`:
- Line 41: Update the sentence that currently reads "If you choose to use a
different starter template, contents of `frontend/src` will differ depending on
your chosen framework" to a smoother phrasing such as "If you choose a different
starter template, the contents of `frontend/src` will differ depending on your
chosen framework" (or "the contents of `frontend/src` will differ depending on
which framework you choose"); locate the sentence referencing `frontend/src` and
replace it with the revised wording to improve grammar and readability.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 4f8a779d-85a0-4e7a-9199-f588f4a92329
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/src/content/docs/guides/dev/project-structure.mdx
|
Thanks 🙏 Please could you add an entry to the changelog located at |
* Rework command initiation to use cobra / viper * abstract init builder away from command package
symball
force-pushed
the
docs_project_structure
branch
from
f564ece to
45255e7
Compare
|
v3/UNRELEASED_CHANGELOG.md updated |
|
✅ Triaged by Wails PR Reviewer This PR has been reviewed and accepted. Head Ref OID: This comment serves as a signature that this PR has been triaged. Future runs will skip this PR based on the headRefOid. |
2 participants
Add missing Project Structure docs page
Summary by CodeRabbit