feat(open-responses): add option to pass reasoning summary for OpenResponses#14115
Open
aayush-kapoor wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
Open
feat(open-responses): add option to pass reasoning summary for OpenResponses#14115aayush-kapoor wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
aayush-kapoor wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
#13439
the open-responses provider did not parse the providerOptions passed for a model and was ignoring options such as
reasoning.summary. it already had the api structure setup -ReasoningParambut wasn'tthe original issue talks about AI SDK not parsing the reasoning effort but reasoning was added as a top level param and was taken care of
Summary
parseProviderOptionsfunction to parse the provider options passed along with an open-responses providercreateOpenResponsesso that provider option namespace uses the same value (and doesn't pass if not the same)Manual Verification
verified by running the example
examples/ai-functions/src/generate-text/open-responses/lmstudio-reasoning.tsChecklist
pnpm changesetin the project root)Related Issues
fixes #13439