Skip to content

Add documentation for Delta Lake's checkpoint processing parallelism configuration #25632

Merged
raunaqmorarka merged 1 commit into
trinodb:masterfrom
zhaner08:xuanyu_update_delta_doc_1
Apr 20, 2025
Merged

Add documentation for Delta Lake's checkpoint processing parallelism configuration #25632
raunaqmorarka merged 1 commit into
trinodb:masterfrom
zhaner08:xuanyu_update_delta_doc_1

Conversation

@zhaner08
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

As a quick follow up to this PR: #25469, adding documentation for Delta Lake's checkpoint processing parallelism configuration

Additional context and related issues

Release notes

(X ) This is not user-visible or is docs only, and no release notes are required.
( ) Release notes are required. Please propose a release note for me.
( ) Release notes are required, with the following suggested text:

## Section
* Fix some things. ({issue}`issuenumber`)

@cla-bot cla-bot Bot added the cla-signed label Apr 19, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the docs label Apr 19, 2025
@zhaner08 zhaner08 requested a review from findinpath April 19, 2025 20:52
@zhaner08 zhaner08 self-assigned this Apr 19, 2025
@ebyhr ebyhr requested a review from raunaqmorarka April 19, 2025 22:40
@raunaqmorarka raunaqmorarka merged commit 9d30fe3 into trinodb:master Apr 20, 2025
8 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 475 milestone Apr 20, 2025
@ebyhr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ebyhr commented Apr 21, 2025

Please fix the broken CI:

/docs/src/main/sphinx/connector/delta-lake.md:78: ERROR: Error parsing content block for the "list-table" directive: uniform two-level bullet list expected, but row 29 does not contain the same number of items as row 1 (4 vs 3).

@zhaner08
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Please fix the broken CI:

/docs/src/main/sphinx/connector/delta-lake.md:78: ERROR: Error parsing content block for the "list-table" directive: uniform two-level bullet list expected, but row 29 does not contain the same number of items as row 1 (4 vs 3).

Thanks, fixed

@raunaqmorarka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

How come the CI was originally green here ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants