Skip to content

Complete BackTracking-1#1143

Open
dhruvil15 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
dhruvil15:master
Open

Complete BackTracking-1#1143
dhruvil15 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
dhruvil15:master

Conversation

@dhruvil15
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Combination Sum (Problem70.java)

Strengths:

  • Excellent use of backtracking with proper add/remove pattern instead of creating deep copies
  • Clear code structure with labeled base cases and action/recurse/backtrack pattern
  • Proper use of pivot index to allow element reuse while avoiding duplicate combinations
  • More space-efficient than the reference solution

Areas for Improvement:

  • The time complexity notation could be more precise. While O(2^(m+n)) is technically correct, a more accurate bound would be O(n * 2^n) where n is the target, as each element can be chosen up to target/min(candidates) times
  • Consider adding early termination when target == 0 is found in the loop (though this is a minor optimization)

The solution demonstrates a solid understanding of backtracking algorithms and is well-implemented.

VERDICT: PASS


Operations and expressions (Problem71.java)

The solution is functionally correct and matches the reference implementation exactly. The backtracking approach is well-implemented with proper state management. The code demonstrates good understanding of:

  • Operator precedence handling via the tail variable
  • String manipulation efficiency with StringBuilder
  • Base case handling and pruning (leading zeros)

One minor observation: The solution could benefit from more descriptive variable names (e.g., 'pivot' could be 'pos' or 'index', 'tail' could be 'lastOperand'), but the current names are consistent with common LeetCode solutions and are acceptable.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants