Skip to content

actually use USER_ID_FIELD in some places it wasnt used - #789

Open
obayemi wants to merge 6 commits into
sunscrapers:masterfrom
obayemi:feature/consistent-er-uids
Open

actually use USER_ID_FIELD in some places it wasnt used#789
obayemi wants to merge 6 commits into
sunscrapers:masterfrom
obayemi:feature/consistent-er-uids

Conversation

@obayemi

@obayemi obayemi commented Jan 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Make usage of USER_ID_FIELD more consistent
right now using an id that is not strictly the pk field make email templates fail because they follow the USER_ID_FIELD, while the endpoints expect strictly a pk without regard to the USER_ID_FIELD configured in the settings.

it "may" be a breaking change, but it should be a lot more correct, so I'm not completely sure wether or not you should merge this (at least I needed it for my project, and it would be easier for me to merge this rather than have to maintain a fork)

@obayemi
obayemi force-pushed the feature/consistent-er-uids branch from 6f38ad1 to 11ebd83 Compare July 22, 2024 10:28
@obayemi
obayemi force-pushed the feature/consistent-er-uids branch from 11ebd83 to 030ad87 Compare July 22, 2024 10:32
@phx000

phx000 commented Apr 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Any updates on this PR? Would be nice to have this in master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants