Skip to content

Bitshuffle: Fixed clevel argument supported range#384

Merged
t20100 merged 2 commits into
silx-kit:mainfrom
t20100:fix-bshuf-zstd-clevel-doc
May 19, 2026
Merged

Bitshuffle: Fixed clevel argument supported range#384
t20100 merged 2 commits into
silx-kit:mainfrom
t20100:fix-bshuf-zstd-clevel-doc

Conversation

@t20100

@t20100 t20100 commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR corrects the docstring and adds a check of the passed clevel value (see #375 (comment) for description of the issue with negative values).

It also adds a test with different clevel values.

closes #375

@t20100 t20100 added this to the 6.1.0 milestone May 19, 2026
@t20100 t20100 requested a review from payno May 19, 2026 13:13
@t20100

t20100 commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

pinning blosc2-grok and blosc2 for tests to pass as in PR #383

@t20100 t20100 force-pushed the fix-bshuf-zstd-clevel-doc branch from 8f51a74 to 27ababa Compare May 19, 2026 14:22
@t20100 t20100 merged commit 6ece53a into silx-kit:main May 19, 2026
4 checks passed
@t20100 t20100 deleted the fix-bshuf-zstd-clevel-doc branch May 19, 2026 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Passing negative clevel to bitshuffle with zstd does not work

2 participants