Skip to content

lib/: Use the comma operator to perform lvalue conversion - #1717

Open
alejandro-colomar wants to merge 1 commit into
shadow-maint:masterfrom
alejandro-colomar:comma
Open

lib/: Use the comma operator to perform lvalue conversion#1717
alejandro-colomar wants to merge 1 commit into
shadow-maint:masterfrom
alejandro-colomar:comma

Conversation

@alejandro-colomar

@alejandro-colomar alejandro-colomar commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Compound literals are lvalues, and thus somewhat dangerous. Their address can be taken, and they can be assigned to.

We were using statement expressions to perform lvalue conversion on compound literals, transforming them to rvalues, and thus removing their dangers. However, statement expressions are non-standard, and quite complex within the compiler, so it would be interesting to use simpler compiler features to achieve the same.

The comma operator also performs lvalue conversion, and we can use a dummy (void)0 expression to introduce it. This is significantly simpler, and is more portable than the statement expression: it is valid all the way back to C99 (the comma operator and the (void)0 expression are portable to C89, but the compound literal is from C99).

By using a simpler feature, we have a smaller risk of running into a compiler bug.

Suggested-by: @uecker
Cc: @chrisbazley
Cc: @kees
Cc: @flatcap


Compound literals are lvalues, and thus somewhat dangerous.  Their
address can be taken, and they can be assigned to.

We were using statement expressions to perform lvalue conversion
on compound literals, transforming them to rvalues, and thus removing
their dangers.  However, statement expressions are non-standard, and
quite complex within the compiler, so it would be interesting to use
simpler compiler features to achieve the same.

The comma operator also performs lvalue conversion, and we can use
a dummy (void)0 expression to introduce it.  This is significantly
simpler, and is more portable than the statement expression: it is valid
all the way back to C99 (the comma operator and the (void)0 expression
are portable to C89, but the compound literal is from C99).

By using a simpler feature, we have a smaller risk of running into
a compiler bug.

Suggested-by: Martin Uecker <uecker@tugraz.at>
Cc: Christopher Bazley <chris.bazley@arm.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Russon <rich@flatcap.org>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant