handle assert.skip #26

Activity

1. hville commented on Sep 4, 2015

   

   hville

   on Sep 4, 2015

   More actions

   This would be really nice since future test get hidden as passed. Unfortunately, it looks like the 'tap-out' parser doesn't support it out of the box. Would you consider another parser (eg. tap-parser) or did you already had a plan on how to go about this?
2. shime commented on Oct 6, 2015

   

   shime

   on Oct 6, 2015

   More actions

   👍
3. scottcorgan commented on Oct 6, 2015

   

   scottcorgan

   on Oct 6, 2015

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   What does your unformatted TAP output look like when you skip a test?
4. shime commented on Oct 6, 2015

   

   shime

   on Oct 6, 2015

   More actions

   yeah, sorry about that... found out this is related to tape, so it should probably wait until tape-testing/tape#197 lands, at least when used with tape
5. scottcorgan commented on Oct 6, 2015

   

   scottcorgan

   on Oct 6, 2015

   OwnerAuthor

   More actions

   Will keep open until that's addressed in tape
6. keithamus commented on Nov 7, 2015

   

   keithamus

   on Nov 7, 2015

   More actions

   FYI @scottcorgan I've added some details in tap-out about TODO and SKIP tests - see scottcorgan/tap-out#16
7. scottcorgan

   closed this as completedon Jun 5, 2018