Deprecate non boolean if syntax - #22123
Merged
Merged
Conversation
14 tasks
Contributor
|
Is printing of non booleans changed to use the new syntax too? |
Contributor
Author
|
I'm working on it (in a separate PR) |
proux01
marked this pull request as ready for review
June 30, 2026 06:54
gares
reviewed
Jul 1, 2026
Member
|
@coqbot merge now |
Contributor
|
@gares: You cannot merge this PR because:
|
Member
|
@coqbot merge now |
Contributor
|
@gares: You can't merge the PR because it hasn't been approved yet. |
gares
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2026
Member
|
@coqbot merge now |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Deprecate the non boolean
if t then _ else _syntax (in favour ofif t is <first_constructor> then _ else _).Depends on:
#21609, #22124(merged)Updated documented syntax by runningmake doc_gram_rsts.