docs(map): describe the authority-owned Solmara Lab - #796
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 207340a0b0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Addressed the Codex review. P1, README-only evidence anchor: fixed. The per-requirement enumeration was the strong claim and it is gone. The visible prose keeps the weak form ("some of its requirements"), and the note is now a P2, SQLite in the Evidence source model: correct, and deferred as out of scope. The finding is right on the facts: |
207340a to
127646e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 127646e6de
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
127646e to
6c17e60
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6c17e60017
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
6c17e60 to
7040514
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7040514056
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Solmara Lab is built around six authority-owned Evidence cells that sign independently, five purpose-limited Relay projects, and one lab Mint. The project map still described the topology that came before it: it claimed the lab does not own Evidence Gateway deployment, listed workload identity agents and Postgres among the services it runs, and pinned a README from before the reset. The map now pins the lab's compose file, cell definitions, Relay projects, and publisher scripts beside that README, so each claim about the topology and the publisher lifecycle rests on configuration and code rather than prose. The architecture page fenced Relay-as-a-source off as a retired workflow. It is the standing arrangement for the requirements that read a named Relay lookup, so the page says that without naming them; which requirement reads which cadence lives with the deployment configuration in the lab's own repository and carries a TODO[evidence] marker until it is citable from here. The historical tutorial and its diagram state that Evidence Gateway does not require Relay rather than claiming no deployment uses one. Signed-off-by: Jeremi Joslin <jeremi@joslin.fr>
7040514 to
ba501a2
Compare
1 participant
Pull Request
Summary
Owning area:
docs/site/.Solmara Lab is built around six authority-owned Evidence cells that sign
independently, five purpose-limited Relay projects, and one lab Mint. The
project map still described the topology that came before it.
src/data/projects.yaml(and the regeneratedsrc/data/generated/projects.json):the
roledescribes the authority cells, the Relay projects, the lab Mint,the programme portal, the Visitor's Center, and the two evidence cadences.
ownsdrops workload identity agents and Postgres, which the lab no longerruns, renames the citizen portal to the programme portal, and adds the
publisher lifecycle.
does_not_owndrops "Evidence Gateway deployment orintegration", which is now the opposite of what the lab demonstrates; the
remaining three entries match the bullets
map/boundaries-and-map.mdxalready states.
3d5c492, inprojects.yamland inthe
boundaries-and-map.mdxownership table.explanation/architecture.mdxfenced Relay-as-a-source off as a retiredworkflow. It is the standing arrangement for the requirements that read a
named Relay lookup, so the page states that, with an evidence comment naming
which requirements read a Relay lookup and which read an immutable extract.
solmara-lab-topology.svgbothasserted that Evidence Gateway no longer uses Relay as a source. Both now
state that it does not require one, which is true of the current product and
of the retired topology the page documents. The retired five-hop description
is unchanged.
Every other Solmara reference in the repo was checked and is still accurate:
AGENTS.md,ROADMAP.md,SUPPORT.md,products/identifiers/README.md, andthe Manifest READMEs whose fixture path still exists on lab main.
Checks
From
docs/site/:npm run check:source(generate, frontmatter, markdownlint, Vale, evidencelinks, docset, release manifests, archive lock, cutover, notary surface,
OpenAPI, config vocabulary, all three tutorial dry-runs, SVG a11y): passed.
npm test: 364 passed, 0 failed.npm run buildthennpm run check:built:current: passed, 18,439 internallinks and 561 llms entries checked.
No test is added: this is a documentation correction with no new functionality.
src/data/generated/projects.jsonis regenerated bynode scripts/generate-data.mjs, never hand-edited.Notes
No release, security, migration, or compatibility impact.
last_reviewedisnot bumped on the two published pages: the style guide reserves that for a
human reading the whole page against source, and this change checked only the
Solmara claims.
DCO
Signed-off-bytrailer.