replace 'homogenous' with 'homogeneous'

[caroharris-maker]

Change instances of 'homogenous' with 'homogeneous'

[google-cla]

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

[pavoljuhas]

Native speakers - is dehomogeneous a real word?

Should it be non-homogeneous instead?

[pavoljuhas]

LGTM, but can someone chime in if we should replace dehomogeneous with non-homogeneous?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.60%. Comparing base (650016f) to head (0c43823).
⚠️ Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8098   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.60%   99.60%           
=======================================
  Files        1114     1114           
  Lines      100849   100849           
=======================================
  Hits       100449   100449           
  Misses        400      400           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[mhucka]

LGTM, but can someone chime in if we should replace dehomogeneous with non-homogeneous?

I'm not a native speaker, but I can say:

• "dehomogeneous" is a word, but a very specialized technical term used in some areas of math and computer vision, and I don't think its meaning is the sense intended in this PR
• "nonhomogeneous" is an adjective meaning not uniform throughout, or consisting of parts that are different from each other, but I think that's also not likely to be the sense intended in this PR
• instead, I believe it should be "inhomogeneous", as in "inhomogeneous phase effects"

Reference: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp2088109#:~:text=homogeneous%20dephasing%20(decoherence)%20and%20inhomogeneous%20dephasing

[pavoljuhas]

• instead, I believe it should be "inhomogeneous", as in "inhomogeneous phase effects"

Sounds great, thank you for clearing this up @mhucka!

@caroharris-maker - can you please adjust the PR per Mike's #8098 (comment)?