Skip to content

ci: declare workflow-level contents: read on 12 workflows#19610

Open
arpitjain099 wants to merge 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
arpitjain099:chore/declare-workflow-perms-readonly
Open

ci: declare workflow-level contents: read on 12 workflows#19610
arpitjain099 wants to merge 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
arpitjain099:chore/declare-workflow-perms-readonly

Conversation

@arpitjain099
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pins the default GITHUB_TOKEN to contents: read on 12 workflows in .github/workflows/ that don't call a GitHub API beyond the initial checkout.

The following files were left implicit because they reference GITHUB_TOKEN / use a write-scope action / trigger on pull_request_target. Those scopes are best declared by maintainers: add-unanswered-to-project.yml, docker-builds.yml, pending_user_response.yml.

Why

CVE-2025-30066 (March 2025 tj-actions/changed-files supply-chain compromise) exfiltrated GITHUB_TOKEN from workflow logs. Pinning per workflow caps runtime authority irrespective of the repo or org default, gives drift protection if the default ever widens, and is credited per-file by the OpenSSF Scorecard Token-Permissions check.

YAML validated locally with yaml.safe_load on each touched file.

Pins the default GITHUB_TOKEN to contents: read on the workflows in
.github/workflows/ that don't call a GitHub API beyond the initial
checkout. The other workflows in this directory are left implicit
because they need write scopes that a maintainer is better placed
to declare.

Motivation: CVE-2025-30066 (March 2025 tj-actions/changed-files
compromise) exfiltrated GITHUB_TOKEN from workflow logs. Per-workflow
caps bound runtime authority irrespective of repo or org default,
give drift protection if the default ever widens, and are credited
per-file by the OpenSSF Scorecard Token-Permissions check.

YAML validated locally with yaml.safe_load.

Signed-off-by: Arpit Jain <arpitjain099@gmail.com>
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented May 15, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/19610

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 15, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants