empty pr for testing ci

[lybcodes]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• [✅] No code

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated README top-section formatting by adding extra blank lines after the main header. This is a formatting-only change that preserves images and all subsequent content while improving the visual spacing and readability of the document's header area.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jayson-huang for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[pantheon-ai]

@lybcodes I've received your pull request and will start the review. I'll conduct a thorough review covering code quality, potential issues, and implementation details.

⏳ This process typically takes 10-30 minutes depending on the complexity of the changes.

_{ℹ️ Learn more details on Pantheon AI.}

[pingcap-cla-assistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6aa0d9e2-11fa-45c6-9159-1f87de64f0e0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0fc6184 and 2198f89.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added six blank lines after the top-level # TiFlash header in README.md; no other content or functionality changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation formatting README.md	Inserted six blank lines immediately after the top-level # TiFlash header (formatting-only change, +6 lines).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

I’m a rabbit who hops through docs with cheer,
I padded the header with spaces quite dear.
Six gentle gaps now let the title gleam,
A tiny hop, a quiet dream. 🐇✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description follows the template structure but contains incomplete information—the Problem Summary and commit-message sections are empty, conflicting with the actual README changes made.	Fill in the Problem Summary explaining the purpose of the change and add a meaningful commit message describing the README modifications.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'empty pr for testing ci' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't convey meaningful information about the actual change (adding blank lines to README).	Revise the title to specifically describe the actual change, such as 'Add blank lines to README header' or 'Update README formatting'.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[lybcodes]

/hold

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-tsan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-tsan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-tsan

[ti-chi-bot]

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-tsan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/retest

[lybcodes]

/retest

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/test all

[ti-chi-bot]

@lybcodes: No jobs can be run with /test all.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test pull-integration-next-gen

/test pull-integration-test

/test pull-unit-next-gen

/test pull-unit-test

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test pull-error-log-review

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

/test pull-sanitizer-tsan

Details

In response to this:

/test all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-asan

[lybcodes]

/test pull-sanitizer-tsan