🌱 Add Jamie Magee as a maintainer for Azure DevOps#5024
🌱 Add Jamie Magee as a maintainer for Azure DevOps#5024justaugustus merged 1 commit intoossf:mainfrom
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5024 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 66.80% 69.78% +2.98%
==========================================
Files 230 252 +22
Lines 16602 15736 -866
==========================================
- Hits 11091 10982 -109
+ Misses 4808 3873 -935
- Partials 703 881 +178 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
justaugustus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@JamieMagee — Thanks for actioning on this and for accepting the offer to help us maintain the Azure DevOps client implementation paths!
Can you also add an entry for the team in MAINTAINERS.md?
3b3e00c to
ca615e5
Compare
ca615e5 to
b281817
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jamie Magee <jamie.magee@gmail.com>
b281817 to
d5551f8
Compare
justaugustus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@spencerschrock @AdamKorcz @jeffmendoza — Given this was my recommendation to add Jamie as an Azure DevOps maintainer, I would like to get another explicit +1 from @ossf/scorecard-maintainers
I, of course, am hugely in favor of adding Jamie :)
|
+1 👍 Awesome |
justaugustus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Welcome and thank you, @JamieMagee!
|
[Closing the loop] |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adds a CODEOWNERS entry so I get review requests for changes to
/clients/azuredevopsrepo/.What is the current behavior?
Changes to
/clients/azuredevopsrepo/only notify@ossf/scorecard-maintainersfor review.What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
I am also requested for review on changes to
/clients/azuredevopsrepo/.Which issue(s) this PR fixes
NONE
Special notes for your reviewer
NONE
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?