Skip to content

NO-JIRA: feat: add remaining netedge evaluations (follow-up to #138)#195

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 3 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
bentito:add-netedge-evals
Apr 22, 2026
Merged

NO-JIRA: feat: add remaining netedge evaluations (follow-up to #138)#195
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 3 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
bentito:add-netedge-evals

Conversation

@bentito
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bentito bentito commented Mar 26, 2026

This PR introduces evaluation tasks for the four remaining netedge tools that were not covered in PR #138.

Changes:

  • New Evaluation Tasks: Added inspect-route, get-service-endpoints, probe-dns-local, and probe-http tasks to evals/tasks/netedge/ to complete the core NIDS diagnostic capabilities test suite.
  • Documentation: Updated docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md to include step-by-step instructions for running these 4 new validations.

Verification:
Follow the steps in docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md to run the evaluations.

  • inspect-route: Verifies inspecting the default OpenShift console route.
  • get-service-endpoints: Verifies listing endpoint slices for router-default.
  • probe-dns-local: Verifies querying cluster DNS via the MCP server host.
  • probe-http: Verifies HTTP reachability to the internal Kubernetes API.

Note: Similar to the previous evaluations, these require an OpenShift environment and will fail on Kind due to dependencies on OpenShift-specific CRDs and service discovery.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated OpenShift validation guide: replaced evaluation CLI with mcpchecker and expanded the evaluation set by four tests; simplified environment setup to require only RH_GEMINI_API_KEY.
  • New Features

    • Added evaluation tasks for console route inspection, ingress service endpoints, local DNS probing, and HTTP endpoint probing.
  • Chores / Behavior

    • Agent execution simplified to a direct "acp" command.
    • Judge now uses a built-in Gemini 2.5 Pro model.

This adds mcpchecker (gevals) evaluations for the four remaining netedge tools that were not covered in PR openshift#138:
- inspect_route
- get_service_endpoints
- probe_dns_local
- probe_http

Also updates the NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md doc with the new test commands.
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 26, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Replaces the gevals runner with mcpchecker in docs, adds four new NetEdge evaluation Task manifests, removes the Gemini agent's custom commands runPrompt in favor of an acp command, and switches the eval judge config from env-based judge to an explicit builtin LLM agent reference.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation
docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md
Replaced gevals with mcpchecker in commands and debugging tips; updated environment key requirements to only RH_GEMINI_API_KEY; expanded listed evaluation set from 2 to 6 tests (inspect-route, get-service-endpoints, probe-dns-local, probe-http).
NetEdge evaluation tasks
evals/tasks/netedge/inspect_route/task.yaml, evals/tasks/netedge/get_service_endpoints/task.yaml, evals/tasks/netedge/probe_dns_local/task.yaml, evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml
Added four new Task manifests (inspect-route, get-service-endpoints, probe-dns-local, probe-http) each with verify steps, inline prompts, and assertions.toolsUsed constraints targeting specific MCP/kubernetes tool patterns and args.
Gemini agent runtime
evals/gemini-agent/agent.yaml
Removed the commands block and its runPrompt shell script (MCP registration, env/key handling, gemini execution, cleanup) and replaced with acp command invoking gemini --acp.
Judge configuration
evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml
Replaced env-based config.llmJudge (JUDGE_BASE_URL, JUDGE_API_KEY, JUDGE_MODEL_NAME) with a fixed ref to type: builtin.llm-agent using model openai:gemini-2.5-pro.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Agent as Gemini Agent (acp)
    participant Judge as Builtin LLM Judge
    participant MCP as MCP Tools
    participant K8s as Kubernetes Cluster

    User->>Agent: run `gemini --acp` (mcpchecker-driven eval)
    Agent->>Judge: submit evaluation prompt / data
    Judge->>Agent: verdict / scoring
    Agent->>MCP: invoke tool (e.g., inspect_route, probe_http, get_service_endpoints, probe_dns_local)
    MCP->>K8s: perform requested action (kubectl/tool calls)
    K8s-->>MCP: return results
    MCP-->>Agent: tool output
    Agent-->>User: aggregated evaluation output
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

Poem

🐰 I hopped along the validation trail,
New probes and routes in tidy detail,
Docs swapped names, the agent trimmed its hat,
Judge now listens where the model sat—
Cheers! The net-edge rabbits clap and exhale.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding four remaining NetEdge evaluation tasks (inspect-route, get-service-endpoints, probe-dns-local, probe-http) that were not covered in PR #138.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from Kaustubh-pande and matzew March 26, 2026 20:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml (1)

8-14: Constrain the asserted method to GET.

The prompt requires GET, but current assertion only checks URL. Adding method: "GET" makes the evaluation intent explicit and resilient to defaults.

Suggested patch
   assertions:
     toolsUsed:
       - server: kubernetes
         toolPattern: "probe_http"
         args:
           url: "https://kubernetes.default.svc:443"
+          method: "GET"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml` around lines 8 - 14, The assertion
for the probe_http tool currently only specifies args.url
("https://kubernetes.default.svc:443") and doesn't constrain the HTTP method;
update the toolsUsed entry for toolPattern "probe_http" to include args.method
set to "GET" so the evaluation explicitly requires an HTTP GET request (i.e.,
add method: "GET" alongside the existing url in the args for the probe_http
tool).
docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md (1)

60-78: Optional: reduce command duplication by exporting env vars once.

These four new commands are correct, but repeating the same export chain on every line makes updates error-prone.

Suggested doc cleanup
+export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY
+export JUDGE_API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY
+export JUDGE_BASE_URL="https://api.openai.com/v1"
+export JUDGE_MODEL_NAME="gpt-4o"
+
 **Test 3: Inspect Route**
 ```bash
-export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY && export JUDGE_API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY && export JUDGE_BASE_URL="https://api.openai.com/v1" && export JUDGE_MODEL_NAME="gpt-4o" && ./gevals check evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml --run "inspect-route" -v
+./gevals check evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml --run "inspect-route" -v

...

</details>

<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md around lines 60 - 78, Move the
repeated export chain out of each individual command and set the environment
once (e.g., a preamble or an env block) so the four runs only call the runner;
remove the leading exports from the commands that invoke ./gevals check
evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml --run "inspect-route" / "get-service-endpoints" /
"probe-dns-local" / "probe-http" and instead place: export
RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=...; export JUDGE_API_KEY=...; export
JUDGE_BASE_URL="https://api.openai.com/v1"; export JUDGE_MODEL_NAME="gpt-4o"
once above the commands (or document using an env file or wrapper script) so
future updates change a single location rather than each run invocation.


</details>

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents</summary>

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @evals/tasks/netedge/probe_dns_local/task.yaml:

  • Around line 8-15: The assertions currently check toolsUsed ->
    server/toolPattern/args for the probe but do not enforce the DNS query type;
    update the assertion for the probe_dns_local tool (toolPattern "probe_dns_local"
    with server "172.30.0.10" and name "kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.local") to
    include args.type set to "A" so the test only passes when an A-record query is
    performed and returns the expected addresses/response code.

Nitpick comments:
In @docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md:

  • Around line 60-78: Move the repeated export chain out of each individual
    command and set the environment once (e.g., a preamble or an env block) so the
    four runs only call the runner; remove the leading exports from the commands
    that invoke ./gevals check evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml --run "inspect-route" /
    "get-service-endpoints" / "probe-dns-local" / "probe-http" and instead place:
    export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=...; export JUDGE_API_KEY=...; export
    JUDGE_BASE_URL="https://api.openai.com/v1"; export JUDGE_MODEL_NAME="gpt-4o"
    once above the commands (or document using an env file or wrapper script) so
    future updates change a single location rather than each run invocation.

In @evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml:

  • Around line 8-14: The assertion for the probe_http tool currently only
    specifies args.url ("https://kubernetes.default.svc:443") and doesn't constrain
    the HTTP method; update the toolsUsed entry for toolPattern "probe_http" to
    include args.method set to "GET" so the evaluation explicitly requires an HTTP
    GET request (i.e., add method: "GET" alongside the existing url in the args for
    the probe_http tool).

</details>

<details>
<summary>🪄 Autofix (Beta)</summary>

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "4b0d0e0a-96d7-4f10-b296-3a18ea78f0b9"} --> Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- [ ] <!-- {"checkboxId": "ff5b1114-7d8c-49e6-8ac1-43f82af23a33"} --> Create a new PR with the fixes

</details>

---

<details>
<summary>ℹ️ Review info</summary>

<details>
<summary>⚙️ Run configuration</summary>

**Configuration used**: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

**Review profile**: CHILL

**Plan**: Pro

**Run ID**: `9e86cd1b-50a9-4fca-bd51-a8960fa8f9b8`

</details>

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ef4ee53951b47772ddb5c5e87b29aeecd7a7bee and 3c84ced1b9613f23846a0e5ccffde4e18701e24d.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (5)</summary>

* `docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md`
* `evals/tasks/netedge/get_service_endpoints/task.yaml`
* `evals/tasks/netedge/inspect_route/task.yaml`
* `evals/tasks/netedge/probe_dns_local/task.yaml`
* `evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml`

</details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->

Comment thread evals/tasks/netedge/probe_dns_local/task.yaml Outdated
@bentito
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

bentito commented Mar 27, 2026

@coderabbitai why did the fips-image-scan-openshift-mcp-server check fail?

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get check runs for PR `#195`
gh pr checks 195 --repo openshift/openshift-mcp-server 2>&1

# Also get the detailed check run logs
gh api repos/openshift/openshift-mcp-server/commits/$(gh pr view 195 --repo openshift/openshift-mcp-server --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)/check-runs --jq '.check_runs[] | select(.name | contains("fips")) | {name: .name, status: .status, conclusion: .conclusion, details_url: .details_url, output: .output}' 2>&1

Length of output: 2185


@bentito The ci/prow/fips-image-scan-openshift-mcp-server check failed due to a Pod scheduling timeout — this is a transient CI infrastructure issue, not a problem with your code changes. The Prow job's pod couldn't be scheduled on the cluster in time.

You can see the details here: Prow job log

All other CI jobs (images, lint, security, test) passed successfully. To re-trigger just this job, you can comment on the PR:

/test fips-image-scan-openshift-mcp-server

@bentito
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

bentito commented Mar 27, 2026

/test fips-image-scan-openshift-mcp-server

…ent configuration

- Pin DNS record type to 'A' in probe_dns_local task as requested in PR review.
- Refine task prompts to be more explicit about using specialized tools.
- Simplify gemini-agent configuration to use ACP (Agent Communication Protocol).
- Update judge configuration to use builtin.llm-agent.

Signed-off-by: bentito <btofel@redhat.com>
@bentito
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

bentito commented Apr 10, 2026

/assign @matzew

Comment thread evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml
Comment thread docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md (3)

16-23: Consider clarifying path assumptions.

The build instructions assume a specific directory layout (../mcpchecker relative to ../openshift-mcp-server/). Consider adding a note that users should adjust paths based on their actual clone locations, or use absolute paths in the example.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md` around lines 16 - 23, The
"Build/Install mcpchecker" step assumes a specific relative layout (cloning to
../mcpchecker and moving the binary to ../openshift-mcp-server) which may
confuse users; update the documentation section to explicitly state that paths
are examples and should be adjusted to match the user's clone locations, and
provide an alternative using an explicit destination variable or absolute paths
(e.g., mention using a WORKDIR or DEST_DIR variable) so readers understand they
can replace ../mcpchecker and ../openshift-mcp-server with their actual paths
when running the git clone, go build, and mv commands.

51-77: Simplify redundant environment variable exports.

Each test command includes export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY &&, which is redundant if the variable is already set (as indicated in Prerequisites). Consider simplifying by either:

  1. Removing the export from each command (assuming users follow the Prerequisites)
  2. Adding a single export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY instruction before all tests
📝 Simplified example
 3.  **Run the Evaluations**:
+    Ensure your API key is exported:
+    ```bash
+    export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY
+    ```
+
     Run `mcpchecker` checks using the Gemini Agent.
     
     **Test 1: Get CoreDNS Configuration**
     ```bash
-    export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY && ./mcpchecker check evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml --run "get-coredns-config" -v
+    ./mcpchecker check evals/gemini-agent/eval.yaml --run "get-coredns-config" -v
     ```
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md` around lines 51 - 77, Remove the
redundant per-test "export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY &&" prefix from
the Gemini Agent test commands (the lines that run ./mcpchecker with --run
"get-coredns-config", "query-prometheus-ingress", "inspect-route",
"get-service-endpoints", "probe-dns-local", and "probe-http") and either add a
single "export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY" line once before the test blocks or assume the
Prerequisites already set the variable and leave the commands as plain
"./mcpchecker ..." invocations; update the code blocks accordingly so each test
runs without the repeated export.

51-77: The test name format in the documentation is correct.

The --run parameter values match the name: fields defined in the task.yaml files (e.g., get-coredns-config, inspect-route, get-service-endpoints), so the test commands will execute as intended.

Minor: The export RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY && pattern can be simplified to just RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY ./mcpchecker ... if the variable is already in the environment, avoiding the redundant export.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md` around lines 51 - 77, The
commands repeatedly use the redundant prefix `export
RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY &&` before invoking ./mcpchecker; change
each occurrence so the env var is set inline (e.g.,
`RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY ./mcpchecker ...`) for Test 1/2/3/4/5/6
lines that call ./mcpchecker with --run values like "get-coredns-config",
"query-prometheus-ingress", "inspect-route", "get-service-endpoints",
"probe-dns-local", and "probe-http".
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md`:
- Around line 16-23: The "Build/Install mcpchecker" step assumes a specific
relative layout (cloning to ../mcpchecker and moving the binary to
../openshift-mcp-server) which may confuse users; update the documentation
section to explicitly state that paths are examples and should be adjusted to
match the user's clone locations, and provide an alternative using an explicit
destination variable or absolute paths (e.g., mention using a WORKDIR or
DEST_DIR variable) so readers understand they can replace ../mcpchecker and
../openshift-mcp-server with their actual paths when running the git clone, go
build, and mv commands.
- Around line 51-77: Remove the redundant per-test "export
RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY &&" prefix from the Gemini Agent test
commands (the lines that run ./mcpchecker with --run "get-coredns-config",
"query-prometheus-ingress", "inspect-route", "get-service-endpoints",
"probe-dns-local", and "probe-http") and either add a single "export
RH_GEMINI_API_KEY" line once before the test blocks or assume the Prerequisites
already set the variable and leave the commands as plain "./mcpchecker ..."
invocations; update the code blocks accordingly so each test runs without the
repeated export.
- Around line 51-77: The commands repeatedly use the redundant prefix `export
RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY &&` before invoking ./mcpchecker; change
each occurrence so the env var is set inline (e.g.,
`RH_GEMINI_API_KEY=$RH_GEMINI_API_KEY ./mcpchecker ...`) for Test 1/2/3/4/5/6
lines that call ./mcpchecker with --run values like "get-coredns-config",
"query-prometheus-ingress", "inspect-route", "get-service-endpoints",
"probe-dns-local", and "probe-http".

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6fa565ce-e1bc-46a1-b858-7c3f0104c08a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3c0f1f and 7dbaa62.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md
  • evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • evals/tasks/netedge/probe_http/task.yaml

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

@bentito: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@matzew matzew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bentito, matzew

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 22, 2026
@matzew matzew changed the title feat: add remaining netedge evaluations (follow-up to #138) NO-JIRA: feat: add remaining netedge evaluations (follow-up to #138) Apr 22, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 22, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bentito: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

This PR introduces evaluation tasks for the four remaining netedge tools that were not covered in PR #138.

Changes:

  • New Evaluation Tasks: Added inspect-route, get-service-endpoints, probe-dns-local, and probe-http tasks to evals/tasks/netedge/ to complete the core NIDS diagnostic capabilities test suite.
  • Documentation: Updated docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md to include step-by-step instructions for running these 4 new validations.

Verification:
Follow the steps in docs/openshift/NETEDGE-validation-how-to.md to run the evaluations.

  • inspect-route: Verifies inspecting the default OpenShift console route.
  • get-service-endpoints: Verifies listing endpoint slices for router-default.
  • probe-dns-local: Verifies querying cluster DNS via the MCP server host.
  • probe-http: Verifies HTTP reachability to the internal Kubernetes API.

Note: Similar to the previous evaluations, these require an OpenShift environment and will fail on Kind due to dependencies on OpenShift-specific CRDs and service discovery.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

  • Updated OpenShift validation guide: replaced evaluation CLI with mcpchecker and expanded the evaluation set by four tests; simplified environment setup to require only RH_GEMINI_API_KEY.

  • New Features

  • Added evaluation tasks for console route inspection, ingress service endpoints, local DNS probing, and HTTP endpoint probing.

  • Chores / Behavior

  • Agent execution simplified to a direct "acp" command.

  • Judge now uses a built-in Gemini 2.5 Pro model.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@matzew
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

matzew commented Apr 22, 2026

/override "Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / openshift-mcp-server-on-pull-request"

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 22, 2026

@matzew: Overrode contexts on behalf of matzew: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / openshift-mcp-server-on-pull-request

Details

In response to this:

/override "Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / openshift-mcp-server-on-pull-request"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 1596731 into openshift:main Apr 22, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
openshift-merge-bot Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2026
[release-0.3] NO-JIRA: feat: add remaining netedge evaluations (backport #195)
@mvinkler
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The new netedge tasks are missing

    labels:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
      suite: netedge     

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants