Skip to content

test: update spec requirement test names - #1454

Open
Jyatin wants to merge 1 commit into
open-feature:mainfrom
Jyatin:fix-492-test-names
Open

test: update spec requirement test names#1454
Jyatin wants to merge 1 commit into
open-feature:mainfrom
Jyatin:fix-492-test-names

Conversation

@Jyatin

@Jyatin Jyatin commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Updates outdated OpenFeature specification requirement references in
packages/server/test/client.spec.ts to match the revised specification
numbering around the static-vs-dynamic context requirements.

Changes

  • Requirement 1.4.1Requirement 1.4.1.1
  • Requirement 1.4.3.1Requirement 1.4.4.1
  • Requirement 1.4.2, 1.4.3Requirement 1.4.3

No SDK implementation behavior or test assertions were changed.

Verification

Focused server client test:

npm exec jest -- --selectProjects=server --runInBand packages/server/test/client.spec.ts

Result:

  • Test Suites: 1 passed
  • Tests: 45 passed
  • Snapshots: 0

Also verified with git diff --check.

@Jyatin
Jyatin requested review from a team as code owners August 26, 2026 21:42
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a6ed78b0-6188-4be5-b503-f6ab938503ef

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7959d6d and cc71c6b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/server/test/client.spec.ts

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The server client test suite updates three requirement references to match revised requirement numbering. No exported or public entities change.

Changes

Server client test references

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update test requirement references
packages/server/test/client.spec.ts
The tests now reference requirements 1.4.1.1, 1.4.4.1, and 1.4.3.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to cc71c

This PR only updates outdated requirement labels in server client tests without changing SDK behavior or assertions; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks.

Suggested reviewers: aepfli

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies a test-only update to specification requirement names. It matches the main change.
Description check ✅ Passed The description accurately explains the requirement reference updates, affected file, verification steps, and unchanged behavior.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Jyatin Jyatin changed the title fix: update spec requirement test names fix: update spec requirement test names Aug 26, 2026
@Jyatin Jyatin changed the title fix: update spec requirement test names test: update spec requirement test names Aug 26, 2026
@Jyatin

Jyatin commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Hi maintainers, just a quick follow-up on this PR. The spec requirement references have been updated and the focused tests are passing (45/45). Whenever you get a chance, I’d appreciate a review. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant