Repository navigation
chore: promotes cupofcat to triager in mutliple repos - #509
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @toddbaert, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request aims to enhance issue management efficiency across various OpenFeature SDK repositories by promoting 'cupofcat' to a 'triager' role. This role, which is focused on issue organization and labeling, will empower 'cupofcat' to streamline the issue backlog, leveraging their prior work in this area, without granting any direct write access to the codebases. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request promotes cupofcat to the triager role in multiple SDK repositories. The changes are straightforward and consistently applied across all the YAML configuration files. The addition of the triagers role is done correctly, following the existing structure of the files.
As a minor suggestion for clarity, you might want to fix a few typos:
- In the pull request title: 'promites' should be 'promotes' and 'mutliple' should be 'multiple'.
- In the description: 'give' should be 'gives'.
Overall, the changes look good and I have no further comments.
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
|
Converting to draft for a moment because I need to confirm with @aepfli that our tooling is actually up to date to support this - the code is merged but I don't think we are using the latest at the moment. |
|
https://github.com/orgs/open-feature/teams triagers are a thing at least we are generating groups already :) |
@cupofcat from Google has been working on organizing a large amount of issues related to SDKs and flagd.
This PR give them limited access in various repos to triage issues. The
triagerrole is minimal, and mostly relates to issue management - no repo write access, instead labels, issues, discussions, etc.