fix(delivery): review the whole candidate before every push - #71
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI (base), Organization UI (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (22)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes make whole-candidate review mandatory before every push. They define review scope, evidence receipts, and publishing checks, then update delivery workflows, reviewer guidance, and related documentation. ChangesWhole-candidate publication gate
Priority: ➖ Normal Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Change: Bug fix Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No concrete merge-blocking issue is established by the supplied evidence. Proceed with normal repository checks. Architecture SummaryArchitecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change affects 4 systems. Changed systems: Architecture concerns Review detailsSystems and components
Before / after behavior
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Delivery could publish a repair or release after reviewing only the latest delta. Require paired adversarial reviews and Codex review of the complete candidate before every push, including repair, rebase, and release pushes. Bind findings and validation to the published tree while keeping CE responsible for online review settlement and merge.
The startup charter, delivery skills, and published guides use the same rule. Record escaped findings, external repair rounds, and time to settlement; preserve unknown historical values instead of inventing a catch rate. Both plugin manifests advance to 0.12.7.
Validation: all 22 cumulative files passed independent correctness/security, maintainability, and Codex reviews. The required native suite passed 554 tests; the 42 affected tests and all site checks passed again after the final changes. The site builds 76 pages. Four restricted process-inspection failures reproduce on the unchanged base and pass in the native suite.
Summary by CodeRabbit