-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
[gtk] add wayland support on linux #51039
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
feliwir
wants to merge
1
commit into
microsoft:master
Choose a base branch
from
feliwir:gtk-wayland
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+8
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this should be always enabled by default? It is still possible to build GTK with X11 backend, and thus this port should give a possibility to do that, and not just hardcode Wayland for Linux
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, currently x11 is also hardcoded for linux. When enabling wayland that does not disable x11, it just enables both backends. So on a X11 desktop GTK would pick the x11 backend, on a wayland desktop the wayland backend (currently it quits there).
Ideally we'd want VCPKG features for the backend selection, but in general this port currently lacks any proper feature support. E.g. vulkan, opengl etc. should also be selectable.
To me it seemed like this is out of scope of this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By this change you will force all applications to build (or install) Wayland even if they don't use it, so this is a breaking change. Also can you confirm that with Wayland backend application will switch to X11 when there is not Wayland support and what is more important will not require installing anything additional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can confirm this since i've used Gtk (without VCPKG) for years. The automatic backend selection is the default behaviour unless explicitly set: https://docs.gtk.org/gtk4/running.html#gdk_backend
This port not having features forces a lot of restrictions. My distro has no X11 support, still this port forces me to build & compile the x11 backend.
If majority wants me to pull this out as a feature I'll do so, but then the other backends should be "optional" aswell
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And in this port you explicitly wet it to use Wayland. I do know that on Wayland X11 applications can run because Wayland provides a special mediator library.
I'm not sure this will work other way around when you build an application setting a Wayland backend that ill fall back to X11 if Wayland is not present.
To clarify: I'm ok to have Wayland a defaul backend, but there should be a possibility to configure this port to use some other backend.
This is basically up to maintainers to decide.
However, the only 'other' backend is
broadway, sincemacosis MacOs specific, andwin32is Windows specific.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with you that features would be sweet, the question is just if this is in scope of this PR.
To have all Gtk build options represented as features would require us to add more than 10+ features probably (e.g. the renderer choice etc.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You don't need to do anything in one PR. You can start with backend options and add other features later.
I mean, if you do this change now, it will be visible immediately (ok, for the majority of users after the next monthly release), and at that point it will be too late to improve something since the only option will be the rollback.
Regarding the other features, if would be nice to have them if they are required.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are things I believe to be true:
There is some time where we would have had to change the backend we choose out of the box, and now that all of the major distros are done so, I think we should. I understand that is exceedingly unfortunate for @AenBleidd 's use case where vcpkg was building all of the X related libraries he needs, but given the GTK maintainer's statement linked above ( gtk-rs/gtk4-rs#1963 (comment) ) that seems like a strong statement that is not the expected user base from their perspective.
EDIT: But if even Ubuntu 22.04 "Noble"'s Wayland is too old we might have no good options?
To that end, I think we should change this to Wayland and/or both.
portfile.cmakecan have an option or something to make it easy for folks in @AenBleidd 's scenario to maintain an overlay port.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not happy with that but that's fair enough. My suggestion would be at least to announce it somewhere before merging that people are aware beforehand and not just awake in the morning to see all their builds failed not knowing what they need to do next to fix them all (I know about version pinning but let's be honest: it doesn't really work since you cannot fix a particular version of particular library without affecting other libraries).
Anyway, @BillyONeal, thank you for the detailed analysis and sorry for any possible mess.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@BillyONeal, a little piece of information for you.
When I last tried to build Wayland (like really build without system packages installed), it was failed due to broken ports (see my comment here).
Not sure how much this is relevant now but worth taking a look I support since you want to enforce Wayland.