Repository navigation
Python: Fold negative literals in InMemoryCollection string filters #14776
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Harshil Kaneria (Harshil26202)
wants to merge
1
commit into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
Harshil26202:python-in-memory-negative-filter-literals
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+28
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
_FoldUnaryNumericConstants(insemantic_kernel.data.vector) only foldsUnaryOp(USub, Constant(n)). Python also parses+1asUnaryOp(UAdd, Constant(1)), and the helper's own docstring talks about parsers that reject unary+/-wholesale. Solambda x: x.vector[0] > +1still fails the allowlist after this visit, while-1now works. Other connectors that already call this helper have the same gap. I'd foldUAddof an int/float constant toConstant(+n)as well, and add a+1/+2.5case next to the negative-literal tests (plus a check that-x.vector[0]still raises).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for looking. You're right that
+1still fails here, but that matches every other connector today. The shared helper deliberately leaves unary plus alone:test_fold_unary_numeric_constants_preserves_other_unary_expressionsintests/unit/data/test_vector_negative_filter_literals.py(added with #14572) asserts that+5and+5.5are not folded.This PR only brings
InMemoryCollectionin line with the other connectors, so I'd rather not change that shared behaviour here. If the maintainers want+nfolded too, it's a small follow-up to the helper and that test, and I'm happy to open it.