Simplify and add Nat proofs#250
Merged
Merged
Conversation
These changes are strictly nonfunctional.
Contributor
Author
|
Looks like a test failure: I'm not sure what that means. |
Collaborator
|
If you update the prelude some of the internal names will change, and the reflection mechanism will expose that. So this is fine, you just need to update the test output. "make test" will let you do that interactively. |
Collaborator
|
Of course I resolved the conflict wrongly, didn't I... I will fix it. |
Contributor
Author
attila-lendvai
pushed a commit
to attila-lendvai-patches/Idris2
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2021
Fix runtime error in `the Int (cast "")`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Simplify some existing Nat proofs, then port over some proofs from Idris 1.
Some of the added proofs go through in Idris 1, but not Idris 2. Those proofs are commented out here, and they should be considered bugs.