Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
6103be4 to
e9b4fd0
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
f69fa61 to
3cf8792
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as low quality.
This comment was marked as low quality.
c5af019 to
5f9395e
Compare
|
Claude finished @252afh's task in 17s —— View job ReviewAdds ADR-0016 for user permissions MVP (2-tier: superuser + user), superseding ADR-0012's 3-tier plan. Clean and well-structured.
⚪️ NIT: "The permissions will need double-handling" is vague. Consider clarifying what double-handling means (e.g., "Permissions logic will need to be revisited and migrated when the 3-tier structure is implemented"). |
…in MVP and updated 0012-minimum-self-serve-decision.md to be superseded by 0016
5f9395e to
ba5b0b6
Compare
|
Claude finished @252afh's task in 15s —— View job ReviewAdds ADR-0016 for a 2-tier permissions MVP (superuser + user), superseding ADR-0012's 3-tier plan. Well-structured and clear.
⚪️ NIT: "The permissions will need double-handling" is vague. Consider clarifying — e.g., "Permissions logic will need to be revisited and migrated when the 3-tier structure is implemented later in the year." Fix this → |
2 participants
Context
A decision was needed on user permissions to advance the work in data setup, this adds an ADR to keep track of that decision.
Changes proposed in this pull request