Skip to content

Add Script to Update BoringSSL#204

Merged
jonasfj merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
update-boringssl
May 21, 2026
Merged

Add Script to Update BoringSSL#204
jonasfj merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
update-boringssl

Conversation

@HamdaanAliQuatil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jonasfj jonasfj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested this, but it looks reasonable to me.

Comment thread .github/workflows/update-boringssl.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/update-boringssl.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/update-boringssl.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/update-boringssl.yml Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jonasfj jonasfj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove the python script, we shouldn't need that right?

Comment thread tool/update-boringssl.py Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/update-boringssl.yml Outdated
Comment on lines +18 to +19
contents: write
pull-requests: write
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure we can do this, but let's try 🤣

Here is the current settings as far as I can set them:
Image

Comment thread lib/src/impl_ffi/impl_ffi.utils.dart Outdated
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
@HamdaanAliQuatil HamdaanAliQuatil dismissed jonasfj’s stale review May 2, 2026 18:44

dismissal of stale review. re-requesting review

@HamdaanAliQuatil HamdaanAliQuatil requested review from jonasfj and removed request for jonasfj May 2, 2026 18:45
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jonasfj jonasfj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't strictly oppose this approach, but I think we should explore what it would take to use the gen/sources.cmake file that is pregenerated and maintained in the boringssl repository.

Comment thread lib/src/boringssl/lookup/utils.dart
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh
Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
@jonasfj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

jonasfj commented May 13, 2026

So this doesn't work, it doesn't copy the sources in correctly.

Comment thread tool/bump-boringssl-revision.sh Outdated
@jonasfj jonasfj merged commit 84c137e into master May 21, 2026
10 checks passed
@jonasfj jonasfj deleted the update-boringssl branch May 21, 2026 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants