Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
This is a sort of brute-force workaround to avoid fortran-lang#153. Likely not up to the standard of `fprettify` but 'works-for-me'. Test amended to cover the corner case, I think.
Implement nicer fix from fortran-lang#168 and switch to previous test framework for older Python versions.
dbroemmel
force-pushed
the
fix_relation_linebreak
branch
from
727f27d to
a908e17
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I tried to rebase to upstream/master |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a sort of brute-force workaround to avoid #153. Likely not up to the standard of
fprettifybut 'works-for-me'.Test amended to cover the corner case, I think.