fix(ported_static): bump gas budgets for EIP-8037 state-gas headroom on Amsterdam

[leolara]

🗒️ Description

Bump gas budgets in 10 tests/ported_static/ files so they pass on fork_Amsterdam under EIP-8037's two-dimensional gas model. Each changed file gets @manually-enhanced so future regenerator runs skip them. Drop 24 corresponding entries from amsterdam_skip_list.txt.

Why

EIP-8037 raises NEW_ACCOUNT state gas to 112 × cost_per_state_byte = 131 488 and per-storage-set state gas to 32 × cpsb = 37 568. The affected tests were authored against pre-EIP-8037 gas budgets; on Amsterdam they OoG before reaching the operation the test exercises (SELFDESTRUCT-to-empty, nested CREATE, init-code SSTORE, multi-CREATE wallet construction, …).

On Cancun / Prague / Osaka the same Fork.create_state_gas / sstore_state_gas helpers return 0, so the bumped budget runs the same code path on the same accounting — no observable difference.

What changed

File	Outer tx gas	Inner CALL gas	Class fixed
stCreate2/test_create2collision_selfdestructed.py	400 000 → 1 000 000	0xC350 → 0x40000 (3×)	BalanceMismatchError × 9
stCreate2/test_create2collision_selfdestructed2.py	400 000 → 1 000 000	0xC350 → 0x40000 (2×)	BalanceMismatchError × 6
stCreate2/test_create2_smart_init_code.py	400 000 → 1 000 000	—	MissingAccountError × 3
stCreate2/test_create2_contract_suicide_during_init_then_store_then_return.py	600 000 → 5 000 000	0x249F0 → 0x100000	MissingAccountError × 3
stCreateTest/test_create_transaction_call_data.py	100 000 → 500 000	—	UnexpectedExecutionFailError × 9
stRevertTest/test_revert_opcode_in_init.py	160 000 → 800 000	—	NonceMismatchError × 2 + UnexpectedExecutionFailError × 4
stSStoreTest/test_sstore_change_from_external_call_in_init_code.py	200 000 → 1 000 000	—	MissingAccountError × 6
stInitCodeTest/test_call_the_contract_to_create_empty_contract.py	100 000 → 500 000	—	NonceMismatchError × 3
stWalletTest/test_day_limit_construction.py	[817 083, 1 217 083] → [5 000 000, 7 000 000]	—	MissingAccountError × 6
stWalletTest/test_wallet_construction.py	[1 225 023, 1 825 023] → [6 000 000, 8 000 000]	—	MissingAccountError × 6

Verification

uv run fill <all 10 files> --fork Amsterdam --output ... --clean -n 4:

==================== 102 passed in 2.24s ====================

Same on --fork Cancun (102 passed, 1.99 s) — confirms the bumps don't change the test outcome on earlier forks.

Reduces the amsterdam_skip_list.txt from 5 458 to 5 445 entries (24 removed; 13 had already been pruned in the corresponding pre-@manually-enhanced cleanup).

What is not in this PR

Discovered while triaging: 7 files where a gas bump did let the tx run, but surfaced a post-state mismatch (coinbase-balance shift, refund-residue accounting, env-gas_limit-is-the-test-parameter, etc.) that can't be fixed without changing the test's premise. Those need either a fork-conditional formula in the post-state (the PR #2790 pattern) or per-parametrization analysis. They're documented under "Tried gas-bump, found NOT simple" in .mb/sync-ported-static-snobal-4/skipped-failures.md (not committed).

The bulk KeyValueMismatchError cluster (1 036 parametrizations) is also out of scope — different fix family.

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

• Same root cause family as fix(ported_static): fork-specific Amsterdam balance for OoG refund tests #2790's OoG-refund balance fix; complementary but independent (touches different files).
• Builds on the sync from chore(ported_static): sync from forks/amsterdam onto snøbal/6 #2783; works on top of devnets/snøbal/4 directly (none of the modified files are touched by chore(ported_static): sync from forks/amsterdam onto snøbal/6 #2783).

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast static checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  just static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
• Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.
• Tests: For PRs implementing a missed test case, update the post-mortem document to add an entry the list.
• Ported Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests or tests/static have been assigned @ported_from marker.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (devnets/bal/7@eb80b43). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             devnets/bal/7    #2796   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   85.58%           
================================================
  Files                    ?      630           
  Lines                    ?    39600           
  Branches                 ?     3936           
================================================
  Hits                     ?    33891           
  Misses                   ?     5084           
  Partials                 ?      625           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	85.58% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[marioevz]

Can we create a call_gas variable that has a different value depending on whether EIP-8037 is enabled in the fork where the test is being executed?

call_gas = 0x249F0
if fork.is_eip_enabled(8037):
  call_gas = 0x100000
# { (CALL 150000 0xc94f5374fce5edbc8e2a8697c15331677e6ebf0b 1 0 0 0 32) (SSTORE 1 (MLOAD 0)) }  # noqa: E501
contract_0 = pre.deploy_contract(  # noqa: F841
code=Op.POP(
Op.CALL(
                gas=call_gas,

This will allow us to preserve the original gas value in case we need to do further modifications, and it also makes it more clear why this gas bump was done in the first place.

[marioevz]

Same comment for the rest of the tests.