[bugfix] Drop functionsOrdered argument from AbstractInternalModule constructor

[joewiz]

Companion to eXist-db/exist#6384 (closes eXist-db/exist#6378). That PR removes the 3-arg AbstractInternalModule(FunctionDef[], Map, boolean) constructor — the base class now always sorts the function table and always binary-searches, so the third argument has no remaining purpose. The flag was the root cause of #6376 (silent function-lookup failure when the FunctionDef[] wasn't sorted).

This one-line change drops the now-removed third argument so the build continues to compile once eXist#6384 merges.

No behavior change at the module level — the previous false value was either redundant (true → array was sorted anyway via the static sort idiom, or sort+binary was unnecessary at this module's scale) or implicit in the new always-sort behavior (false → linear scan and always-binary-search are equivalent for correctness; both find the function). The function lookup contract is unchanged.

[This response was co-authored with Claude Code. -Joe]

[joewiz]

[This response was co-authored with Claude Code. -Joe]

Closing — obsoleted by #367's merge. That PR removed src/main/java/ entirely, so the ConsoleModule.java constructor this PR was patching no longer exists in monex. The super(functions, parameters, true) → super(functions, parameters) change still needs to happen, but it now belongs in eXist core's ConsoleCompatModule (the successor class), which is handled directly by eXist-db/exist#6384.

[joewiz]

[This response was co-authored with Claude Code. -Joe]

Status update: this PR is now optional cleanup rather than required.

Per @line-o's review on eXist-db/exist#6384, the 3-arg AbstractInternalModule(FunctionDef[], Map, boolean) constructor is reinstated as @Deprecated(since = "7.0.0", forRemoval = true) rather than removed. The functionsOrdered parameter is ignored (the base class always sorts), but legacy call sites continue to compile against eXist 7 with just a deprecation warning. So this repo would now build cleanly against develop without any source changes here.

The PR is still worth merging when convenient — dropping the unused third argument removes the warning and is the conventional Java forward path — but it's no longer time-sensitive. Feel free to merge or defer.

[joewiz]

(Oops, obviously, that last comment was no longer relevant for this PR. Please disregard. Sorry for the noise.)