chore: claude bot PR comments deduplication

[pravusjif]

Added cleanup logic for previous Claude comments in the review process.

[github-actions]

New build in progress, come back later!

[pravusjif]

@claude review

[pravusjif]

@claude review

[claude]

Claude finished @pravusjif's task in 47s —— View job

---

Review: chore/deduplicate-claude-review-comments

Root cause: Duplicate Claude review comments accumulate when multiple review runs happen on the same PR. The diff adds cleanup logic that deletes prior Claude review comments after each run. This addresses the cause directly.

The two issues raised in the prior review have been fixed in follow-up commits:

• ✅ [...comments.data].filter(...) — no longer mutates comments.data in place after the earlier .reverse() call (lines 110, 323).
• ✅ c.body?.includes('REVIEW_RESULT:') guard — only previous review comments are deleted now; ad-hoc @claude explain/question responses are preserved (lines 112, 325).

Both cleanup blocks (lines 109–124 and 322–337) are symmetric and correct. Errors during deletion are caught and logged, so a single failure won't break the rest of the workflow.

No further blocking issues.

REVIEW_RESULT: PASS ✅
COMPLEXITY: SIMPLE
COMPLEXITY_REASON: Touches only one CI/CD workflow file; no runtime code changes.
QA_REQUIRED: NO
• Branch

[pravusjif]

@claude review

[claude]

Claude finished @pravusjif's task in 38s —— View job

---

Review: chore/deduplicate-claude-review-comments

Root cause: Duplicate Claude review comments accumulate when multiple review runs happen on the same PR. The diff adds cleanup logic that deletes prior Claude review comments after each run. This fixes the cause directly.

Prior review feedback — both addressed:

• ✅ [...comments.data].filter(...) (lines 109, 322) — copies before filtering, no in-place mutation after the earlier .reverse().
• ✅ c.body?.includes('REVIEW_RESULT:') guard (lines 112, 325) — only previous review comments are deleted; ad-hoc @claude explain/question responses are preserved.

Both cleanup blocks are symmetric. Errors during deletion are caught and logged, so a single failure won't break the rest of the workflow. Self-deletion is correctly prevented via c.id !== claudeComment.id.

Note: Comments from failed reviews (no REVIEW_RESULT: marker) intentionally persist for debugging — likely desired, no change needed.

No blocking issues.

• Read changed workflow file
• Verify prior review feedback was addressed
• Check for new issues
• Post review

REVIEW_RESULT: PASS ✅
COMPLEXITY: SIMPLE
COMPLEXITY_REASON: Touches only one CI/CD workflow file; no runtime code changes.
QA_REQUIRED: NO

Branch •