Add dry run support to the release workflow#6632
Open
dfunkt wants to merge 1 commit intodani-garcia:mainfrom
Open
Add dry run support to the release workflow#6632dfunkt wants to merge 1 commit intodani-garcia:mainfrom
dfunkt wants to merge 1 commit intodani-garcia:mainfrom
Conversation
- specific workflow name via `run_name` variable - provides a "fake" tag to the manifest creation step (default 1.0.0, can be modified) - added to the scheduled cleanup action
Contributor
Author
|
This could also be done without pushing anything to the registry (stopping at the base tag generation step). Depends on whether the goal is to simulate the entire release process or not. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Contributor
Author
|
And how would this |
Contributor
Sorry, I did not check :/ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
run_namevariableSuggested in #6626 (comment)
I left the artifacts & containers attestation enabled, can be removed if deemed unnecessary.
This could be modified to also support PRs, perhaps allowing for test images specific to that PR (could be done now or at a later date)