Repository navigation
ci: allow trusted human LGTM reviewers - #13
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
Note This change is unlikely to harm production. Documentation, test, or CI-only change; nothing that runs in production is affected. Polylane analysed Rate this review: 👍 helpful · 👎 not helpful · 😕 confusing Previous verdicts (2)
|
boristane
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow nwm-54, boristane, fer, and matanyall to post LGTM reviews that the existing workflow converts into approval, matching the setup in coreplanelabs/nominal. Match each GitHub login and immutable user ID: nwm-54 is 45931542, boristane is 10452259, fer is 21882, and matanyall is 28307422. Preserve the existing trusted reviewers, verdict prefix, commented-state requirement, and reviewed-commit guards.
Validated the updated YAML with Bun and checked that the reviewer identity and commit pin remain present. Application tests were not run because this change only updates a workflow reviewer condition.