Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d7f90f1fd3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| jobs: | ||
| commit-authors: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The workflow triggers on both pull_request and push, but this job is hard-gated to PR events (if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'), so direct pushes to master bypass the AI-author check completely. In repositories where maintainers can push directly (or automation pushes without a PR), AI-authored commits can still land despite the stated policy.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| run: | | ||
| git fetch --no-tags --no-recurse-submodules origin "$BASE_SHA" | ||
| offenders=$(git log --no-merges --pretty=format:'%H %an <%ae> committed by %cn <%ce>' "$BASE_SHA".."$HEAD_SHA" \ | ||
| | grep -iE '(claude|codex)' || true) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The grep pattern '(claude|codex)' is a broad substring match across author and committer names/emails, so legitimate humans or domains containing these strings (for example, a person named Claude) will fail CI even when no AI tool authored the commit. This makes the check over-blocking and likely to reject valid contributions.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
No description provided.