-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
Expose body for non RFC 9457 error responses #1955
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kwin
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
feature/log-http-error-body
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ | |
| package org.eclipse.aether.spi.connector.transport.http.RFC9457; | ||
|
|
||
| import java.io.IOException; | ||
| import java.io.UncheckedIOException; | ||
|
|
||
| import org.slf4j.Logger; | ||
| import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * A reporter for RFC 9457 messages. | ||
|
|
@@ -35,6 +39,7 @@ | |
| * @see <a href=https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9457#section-3-7>RFC 9457</a> | ||
| */ | ||
| public abstract class RFC9457Reporter<T, E extends Exception, R> { | ||
| private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(RFC9457Reporter.class); | ||
| public static final String CONTENT_TYPE_PROBLEM_DETAILS_JSON = "application/problem+json"; | ||
| public static final String CONTENT_TYPE_PROBLEM_DETAILS_JSON_AND_ANY = "application/problem+json,*/*"; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -92,6 +97,15 @@ public void generateException(T response, BiConsumerChecked<Integer, String, E> | |
| throw new HttpRFC9457Exception(statusCode, reasonPhrase, rfc9457Payload); | ||
| } | ||
| throw new HttpRFC9457Exception(statusCode, reasonPhrase, RFC9457Payload.INSTANCE); | ||
| } else { | ||
| try { | ||
| LOGGER.debug( | ||
| "Received a response (not RFC 9457 compliant) with status code {}: {}", | ||
| statusCode, | ||
| getBody(response)); | ||
| } catch (IOException e) { | ||
| throw new UncheckedIOException("Failed to read response body", e); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. probably not worth throwing this at all if it just means we couldn't log a debug message |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| baseException.accept(statusCode, reasonPhrase); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Per the Javadoc comment above this is incorrect. baseException should be thrown. I'm not sure if this should be fixed or if the doc needs to be changed, but they should be consistent