Skip to content

[Klaud Cold] minimaxm3-fp8-h200-vllm-agentic-mtp: MiniMax-M3 H200 AgentX EAGLE3 recipe with golden-AL synthetic acceptance / MiniMax-M3 H200 AgentX EAGLE3 配方(黄金 AL 合成接受) - #2424

Open
functionstackx wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
feat/minimaxm3-fp8-h200-agentic-mtp
Open

[Klaud Cold] minimaxm3-fp8-h200-vllm-agentic-mtp: MiniMax-M3 H200 AgentX EAGLE3 recipe with golden-AL synthetic acceptance / MiniMax-M3 H200 AgentX EAGLE3 配方(黄金 AL 合成接受)#2424
functionstackx wants to merge 6 commits into
mainfrom
feat/minimaxm3-fp8-h200-agentic-mtp

Conversation

@functionstackx

@functionstackx functionstackx commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Adds minimaxm3-fp8-h200-vllm-agentic-mtp — the EAGLE3 speculative-decoding (spec-decoding: mtp) variant of the MiniMax-M3 MXFP8 H200 AgentX recipe. One new benchmark script, one master-config entry, one changelog entry; no launcher change is needed (launch_h200-dgxc-slurm.sh already composes agentic/ + _mtp).

Speculative configmethod: eagle3 on Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3, num_speculative_tokens: 3, drafter pinned to FLASH_ATTN (the EAGLE3 head is MHA; FlashInfer only serves the mandatory page size 128 via its trtllm-gen kernel, which needs GQA/MQA). Same draft and level as every merged MiniMax-M3 MTP recipe.

Synthetic forced AL — throughput runs set rejection_sample_method: synthetic with synthetic_acceptance_length: 2.83, the committed golden AL for MiniMax-M3 EAGLE3 at K=3, thinking_on (golden_al_distribution/minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml). Per the AgentX policy in golden_al_distribution/README.md, a submission may choose any supported draft length but may not substitute a different acceptance target. The separate minimaxm3_eagle3_gqa.yaml curve belongs to the Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3-GQA draft (run 29784780049) and is not mixed in. EVAL_ONLY runs drop synthetic acceptance and keep real verification, since synthetic acceptance commits drafted tokens regardless of the target logits and would score the eval at ~0.

Serve shape is otherwise identical to the non-MTP agentic sibling (Mooncake host-DRAM KV offload, --block-size 128, --language-model-only, --kv-cache-dtype fp8, --attention-backend TRITON_ATTN, minimax_m3 parsers, vllm-router for DP-attention) so the spec-decode delta is readable at equal concurrency. max-num-seqs stays 2*CONC for AgentX subagent fan-out; cudagraph capture is raised to MAX_NUM_SEQS*(1+3) tokens because vLLM's FULL_DECODE_ONLY ladder is token-denominated.

Search space covers three arms (TP8 and TP8/EP8 GPU-resident, TP8/EP8 Mooncake) on the AgentX MTP concurrency grid: GPU-resident rows [1, 4, 8, 12, 16], KV-offload rows [4, 8, 12, 16]. Every step is at least 2 concurrency apart and every arm stops hard at conc 16 — single-step sampling cannot separate configurations by more than run-to-run noise on the agentic corpus, and past 16 these SKUs are into the post-HBM-cliff thrashing regime the non-MTP sweeps already characterized. 14 generated jobs.

Validation: bash -n clean; both YAMLs parse; generate_sweep_configs.py test-config emits 14 agentic-coding configs with spec-decoding: mtp and the expected TP/EP/KV arms.

中文说明

新增 minimaxm3-fp8-h200-vllm-agentic-mtp:MiniMax-M3 MXFP8 H200 AgentX(智能体编码)配方的 EAGLE3 投机解码(spec-decoding: mtp)变体。包含一个新的基准测试脚本、一条 master 配置条目和一条 changelog 条目;启动器无需改动(launch_h200-dgxc-slurm.sh 已能拼出 agentic/ + _mtp 路径)。

投机解码配置method: eagle3,草稿头 Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3num_speculative_tokens: 3,drafter 固定 FLASH_ATTN(EAGLE3 头是 MHA,而 FlashInfer 仅通过要求 GQA/MQA 的 trtllm-gen kernel 支持强制的 page size 128)。与仓库中所有已合并的 MiniMax-M3 MTP 配方使用相同的草稿头与投机层数。

合成强制 AL:吞吐量测试设置 rejection_sample_method: syntheticsynthetic_acceptance_length: 2.83,即 MiniMax-M3 EAGLE3 在 K=3、thinking_on 下已提交的黄金 AL(golden_al_distribution/minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml)。依据 golden_al_distribution/README.md 的 AgentX 规则,提交方可自选草稿长度,但不得替换接受长度目标。minimaxm3_eagle3_gqa.yaml 对应的是 Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3-GQA 草稿头(run 29784780049),两条曲线不混用。EVAL_ONLY 场景关闭合成接受、保留真实验证,否则生成文本错误、评估分数接近 0。

服务参数与非 MTP 版本完全一致(Mooncake 主机 DRAM KV 卸载、--block-size 128--language-model-only--kv-cache-dtype fp8--attention-backend TRITON_ATTNminimax_m3 解析器、DP-attention 下的 vllm-router),便于在相同并发下直接对比投机解码带来的差异。max-num-seqs 保持 2*CONC 以容纳 AgentX 子智能体扇出;cudagraph 捕获上限提高到 MAX_NUM_SEQS*(1+3)token,因为 vLLM 的 FULL_DECODE_ONLY 阶梯是按 token 计的。

搜索空间覆盖三条分支(TP8 与 TP8/EP8 GPU 常驻、TP8/EP8 Mooncake),并采用 AgentX MTP 并发网格:GPU 常驻 [1, 4, 8, 12, 16],KV 卸载 [4, 8, 12, 16]。相邻并发间隔至少为 2,且一律止于并发 16 —— 在智能体语料上,逐 1 采样无法区分出超过运行间噪声的差异;而并发超过 16 后,这些 SKU 已进入非 MTP 扫描早已刻画过的显存瓶颈后抖动区间。共生成 14 个作业。

验证bash -n 通过;两个 YAML 均可解析;generate_sweep_configs.py test-config 生成 14 条 agentic-coding 配置,spec-decoding: mtp 与 TP/EP/KV 分支均符合预期。

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Revision (post-first-sweep)

  1. --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90. The first agentic job on [Klaud Cold] minimaxm3-fp8-h100-vllm-agentic-mtp: MiniMax-M3 H100 AgentX EAGLE3 recipe with golden-AL synthetic acceptance / MiniMax-M3 H100 AgentX EAGLE3 配方(黄金 AL 合成接受) #2423 (TP8/EP8 c9, run 30515793863) died mid-warmup: all 8 ranks raised torch.OutOfMemoryError 96 MiB short, killing the engine core (EngineDeadError) and tripping AIPerf's terminal warmup failure. The recipe had inherited the non-MTP agentic sibling's gmu, which has no draft head to house; the proven MTP sibling on each of these SKUs runs 0.90 (explicit on H100/H200, vLLM's default on the ROCm ones). Applied to all four MiniMax PRs.
  2. Concurrency grid. Steps of at least 2 and a hard stop at conc 16, replacing the dense integer sampling copied from the STP siblings.

中文:(1) --gpu-memory-utilization 改为 0.90 —— #2423 的首个智能体作业(TP8/EP8 c9,run 30515793863)在预热阶段 8 个 rank 全部 OOM(仅差 96 MiB),导致 engine core 崩溃并触发 AIPerf 终止性预热失败;此前沿用了非 MTP 版本的取值,而该版本无需为草稿头预留显存,各 SKU 上已验证的 MTP 配置均为 0.90。四个 MiniMax PR 均已修正。(2) 并发网格:相邻间隔至少为 2,且一律止于 16。

@functionstackx
functionstackx requested a review from a team July 30, 2026 05:09
functionstackx added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2026
中文:补充 perf-changelog 中 #2424 的 pr-link。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! Please reach out to respective companies' CODEOWNER to fill in the latest PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md before pinging core maintainer on Slack for review. In order for the signoff PR check bot to trigger, you must follow the PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md template correctly, including the phrase As a PR reviewer and CODEOWNER, I have reviewed this and have.

For PR verification, add the full-sweep-fail-fast label (strongly recommended) to this PR — the benchmark sweep only runs on labeled PRs. Use full-sweep-enabled only if you need matrix jobs to keep running past a failure.

PR authors are responsible for ensuring that after merging, all GitHub Action jobs fully pass. A lot of the time, failures are just flakes and simply re-running the failed jobs will fix it. See GitHub's docs on re-running failed jobs


感谢你的贡献!请联系相应公司的 CODEOWNER 填写最新的 PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md,然后再在 Slack 上联系核心维护者进行审阅。为了触发 signoff PR 检查机器人,你必须正确遵循 PR_REVIEW_CHECKLIST.md 模板,包括保留英文语句 As a PR reviewer and CODEOWNER, I have reviewed this and have

如需进行 PR 验证,请为此 PR 添加 full-sweep-fail-fast 标签(强烈推荐)— 基准测试 sweep 仅在带有标签的 PR 上运行。仅当需要矩阵任务在失败后继续运行时才使用 full-sweep-enabled

PR 作者有责任确保合并后所有 GitHub Action 任务完全通过。 很多时候失败只是偶发抖动(flake),重新运行失败的任务即可解决。参见 GitHub 关于重新运行失败任务的文档

@functionstackx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Draft-head note for reviewers. This recipe uses Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3 with golden AL 2.83 (minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml, thinking_on, K=3), matching the fixed-seq-len MTP sibling on this same SKU.

Worth knowing: #2337 (merged 2026-07-29) moved B200/B300 fp8 to the Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3-GQA head, with the drafter backend going TRITON_ATTN → FLASH_ATTN and K kept at 3. The Hopper and gfx942 fixed-seq-len MTP recipes were not part of that swap and still run the non-GQA head, so this PR follows them — draft and curve stay matched, which is the part that matters for the AgentX contract. If you want the Hopper/ROCm SKUs to follow Blackwell onto the GQA head, it is a two-line change here: the draft id, and AL 2.83 → 2.78 (minimaxm3_eagle3_gqa.yaml, thinking_on, K=3). Say the word and I will make that swap before the sweep spends much more GPU time.

中文:本配方使用 Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3 草稿头,黄金 AL 为 2.83minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml,thinking_on,K=3),与同 SKU 的固定序列长度 MTP 配方保持一致。

需要说明的是:#2337(2026-07-29 合并)已将 B200/B300 fp8 切换到 Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3-GQA 草稿头,drafter 注意力后端由 TRITON_ATTN 改为 FLASH_ATTN,K 仍为 3。Hopper 与 gfx942 的固定序列长度 MTP 配方未包含在该次切换中,仍使用非 GQA 草稿头,因此本 PR 与之保持一致 —— 关键在于草稿头与 AL 曲线相互匹配,这正是 AgentX 规则所要求的。若希望 Hopper/ROCm SKU 也跟随 Blackwell 切到 GQA 草稿头,只需改两处:草稿头 ID,以及 AL 2.83 → 2.78(minimaxm3_eagle3_gqa.yaml,thinking_on,K=3)。如需切换请告知,我会在扫描消耗更多 GPU 前完成。

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beyond the inline pr-link finding, I also checked whether the GPU-resident search-space arms (conc-list ending ...11, 12, 14, 16) silently skip conc=13 as a bug — it's consistent with how these lists are manually curated per arm (the non-MTP sibling's list also omits conc=3), not a generation defect, so I'm not flagging it.

Extended reasoning...

Bugs were already found and reported inline (perf-changelog.yaml pr-link left as TBD), which already signals this PR needs human attention before merge. I independently confirmed that finding against git show HEAD:perf-changelog.yaml, which does show pr-link: TBD as the last line, consistent with the inline report. Beyond that, I reviewed the candidate issue that finder agents raised and verifiers ruled out (GPU-resident search-space arms silently skipping conc=13 in configs/nvidia-master.yaml) and confirmed it is a benign, manually-curated concurrency list rather than a bug, matching the pattern of gaps already present in the non-MTP sibling entry. I'm posting this brief note only to record that this specific candidate was checked, per the exception process for bugs-found reviews.

Comment thread perf-changelog.yaml Outdated
- "Speculative config: method eagle3 on the Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3 draft head, num_speculative_tokens 3, drafter pinned to attention_backend FLASH_ATTN -- the same draft, level and pin as the merged MiniMax-M3 CUDA MTP recipes (the EAGLE3 head is MHA and FlashInfer only serves the mandatory page size 128 through its GQA/MQA-only trtllm-gen kernel)."
- "Throughput runs pin rejection_sample_method synthetic with synthetic_acceptance_length 2.83 -- the committed golden AL for MiniMax-M3 EAGLE3 at K=3, thinking_on (golden_al_distribution/minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml), per the AgentX policy in golden_al_distribution/README.md. The minimaxm3_eagle3_gqa.yaml curve was measured against the Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3-GQA draft (run 29784780049) and is not mixed in. EVAL_ONLY runs drop synthetic acceptance and keep real target verification."
- "Serve shape is otherwise identical to the non-MTP agentic sibling (Mooncake host-DRAM KV offload, --block-size 128, --language-model-only, --kv-cache-dtype fp8, --attention-backend TRITON_ATTN, gpu-memory-utilization 0.92, minimax_m3 parsers, vllm-router for DP-attention), with max-num-seqs 2*CONC for AgentX subagent fan-out and cudagraph capture raised to MAX_NUM_SEQS*(1+3) TOKENS for vLLM's token-denominated FULL_DECODE_ONLY ladder."
- "Search space mirrors the non-MTP entry's three arms (TP8 and TP8/EP8 GPU-resident, TP8/EP8 Mooncake) trimmed at the extreme-conc end: GPU-resident 1-16 (vs 1-20) and Mooncake 5-18 (vs 5-20). The 269k-token service-time-weighted request already places the H200 GPU-resident cliff near conc 10, and the draft head plus draft KV tighten that budget further."

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 The final perf-changelog.yaml entry for this PR has pr-link: TBD instead of https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/2424 — verified directly against HEAD's committed content, not just the diff. This isn't only a style deviation: utils/validate_perf_changelog.py's PR_LINK_PLACEHOLDERS only accepts XXX or the exact real URL, so the standard merge path (utils/merge_with_reuse.shprepare_perf_changelog_merge.py canonicalize) will raise ChangelogValidationError and abort under set -e until this is corrected to the real PR URL (or the XXX placeholder, which the tooling auto-backfills).

Extended reasoning...

What the bug is: The changelog entry appended by this PR ends with pr-link: TBD rather than a real PR URL or a recognized placeholder. I verified this directly with git show HEAD:perf-changelog.yaml | tail, which shows the literal committed content of perf-changelog.yaml at the tip of this PR's branch — the last line is pr-link: TBD. Every other one of the ~658 prior entries in this file uses pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/<N>, matching the convention documented in AGENTS.md.

Why the preloaded diff looked fine: The diff shown in this review's preloaded context happens to render the last line as pr-link: https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/2424. This is a discrepancy between the cached/preloaded diff text and the actual committed blob at HEAD. Since git show HEAD:perf-changelog.yaml reads the real git object for the commit under review (5ed3a3d), it is authoritative over a preloaded diff rendering — and it unambiguously contains TBD, not the pull/2424 URL. I re-ran this check independently before filing to rule out a caching artifact on my end, and the result was consistent.

Why nothing upstream of merge catches it: validation.py's ChangelogEntry.pr_link field is a bare str with no URL/format validation, so generate_sweep_configs.py and friends won't flag it at config-generation time. The CI PR-gate script (process_changelog.py) also doesn't check the value of pr-link on new entries. So a normal CI run against this branch would appear to pass.

Where it actually breaks: The repo's standard merge tooling does check it. utils/merge_with_reuse.sh unconditionally invokes prepare_perf_changelog_merge.py canonicalize under set -e. That script's canonicalize_appended_linkscompare_entriesvalidate_added_pr_link path rejects any appended pr-link value that is neither in PR_LINK_PLACEHOLDERS ({\"XXX\", \"https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/XXX\"}) nor the exact expected URL for the PR being merged. TBD matches neither, so validate_added_pr_link raises ChangelogValidationError, which aborts the merge script.

Step-by-step proof:

  1. Checkout/fetch this PR's branch at commit 5ed3a3d.
  2. Run git show HEAD:perf-changelog.yaml | tail -1 → prints pr-link: TBD.
  3. Run the repo's normal merge path: utils/merge_with_reuse.sh 2424 (or whatever the real merge invocation is for this PR number).
  4. That script calls prepare_perf_changelog_merge.py canonicalize, which loads the new entry, sees pr-link: TBD, and calls validate_added_pr_link(\"TBD\", 2424).
  5. TBD is not in PR_LINK_PLACEHOLDERS and is not equal to https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/2424, so the function raises ChangelogValidationError.
  6. The script is running under set -e, so the merge aborts with a non-zero exit before completing.

The fix is a one-line change: replace pr-link: TBD with either the real URL https://github.com/SemiAnalysisAI/InferenceX/pull/2424, or the XXX placeholder that the canonicalizer will auto-backfill with the correct URL at merge time.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

1 similar comment
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

functionstackx added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2026
中文:补充 perf-changelog 中 #2424 的 pr-link。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@functionstackx
functionstackx force-pushed the feat/minimaxm3-fp8-h200-agentic-mtp branch from 088ef51 to 4d7e99f Compare August 7, 2026 02:42
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

2 similar comments
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

functionstackx and others added 4 commits August 7, 2026 14:27
…n-AL synthetic acceptance

Add minimaxm3-fp8-h200-vllm-agentic-mtp, the spec-decoding=mtp variant of the
MiniMax-M3 MXFP8 H200 agentic-coding recipe: Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3 draft
head, 3 speculative tokens, FLASH_ATTN drafter, and synthetic acceptance pinned
to the committed golden AL 2.83 (minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml, thinking_on, K=3).
EVAL_ONLY keeps real target verification. Serve shape, Mooncake offload and
search-space arms mirror the non-MTP sibling, trimmed at the top concurrencies.

中文:新增 minimaxm3-fp8-h200-vllm-agentic-mtp,即 MiniMax-M3 MXFP8 H200 智能体
编码配方的投机解码(spec-decoding=mtp)变体:Inferact/MiniMax-M3-EAGLE3 草稿头、
3 个投机 token、drafter 固定为 FLASH_ATTN,合成接受长度固定为黄金 AL 2.83
(minimaxm3_eagle3.yaml,thinking_on,K=3)。EVAL_ONLY 保留真实目标验证。服务参数、
Mooncake KV 卸载与搜索空间沿用非 MTP 版本,仅在高并发端裁剪。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
中文:补充 perf-changelog 中 #2424 的 pr-link。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…to fit the EAGLE3 draft

The H100 twin of this recipe died mid-warmup with torch.OutOfMemoryError on all
8 ranks (run 30515793863) because it inherited the non-MTP agentic sibling's
gpu-memory-utilization, which leaves no headroom for the draft head and its KV.
Apply the same correction here pre-emptively: 0.90, matching
fixed_seq_len/minimaxm3_fp8_h200_mtp.sh, the proven MTP setting on this SKU.

中文:本配方的 H100 版本在预热阶段因 8 个 rank 全部 OOM 而失败(run 30515793863),
原因是沿用了非 MTP 版本的 gpu-memory-utilization,未给草稿头及其 KV 预留显存。此处
预先做同样的修正:改为 0.90,与本 SKU 上已验证的 MTP 配置
fixed_seq_len/minimaxm3_fp8_h200_mtp.sh 保持一致。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace the dense integer sampling inherited from the non-MTP agentic siblings
with the AgentX MTP grid: GPU-resident [1,4,8,12,16], offload [4,8,12,16].
Single-step sampling cannot separate configs by more than noise on the agentic
corpus, and past conc 16 these SKUs are in the post-cliff thrashing regime.

中文:将沿用自非 MTP 智能体配方的逐 1 递增并发采样,替换为 AgentX MTP 并发网格:
GPU 常驻 [1,4,8,12,16],KV 卸载 [4,8,12,16]。相邻并发间隔至少为 2,且一律止于 16 ——
逐 1 采样在智能体语料上无法区分出超过噪声的差异,并发超过 16 后这些 SKU 已进入
显存瓶颈后的抖动区间。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@functionstackx
functionstackx force-pushed the feat/minimaxm3-fp8-h200-agentic-mtp branch from 4d7e99f to ed49211 Compare August 7, 2026 18:27
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

1 similar comment
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

functionstackx and others added 2 commits August 7, 2026 23:33
# Conflicts:
#	configs/nvidia-master.yaml
#	perf-changelog.yaml
…he coverage gate

Run 31207046020 failed four cells, all TP8/EP8: GPU-resident c1 and c4, and
Mooncake c4 and c8. None is an engine failure -- each served its requests with a
0% error rate, then AIPerf rejected the profile:

  ProfileMetricCoverageError: Profiling metric coverage below the required 98.0%
  for phase 'profiling': TTFT=95.0-97.6%

At low concurrency on the long-context agentic corpus, too few sessions start
inside the one-hour profiling window for TTFT to be sampled through to the end,
so coverage lands just under the gate.

The boundary is monotone and specific to the EP8 arms: pure TP8 passes at every
concurrency including 1, while EP8 only clears the gate from conc 8
(GPU-resident) and conc 12 (Mooncake) upward -- which is also where expert
parallelism begins doing useful work instead of paying all-to-all overhead on a
nearly empty batch. Keeping those points would re-fail the sweep each run.

GPU-resident EP8 [1, 4, 8, 12, 16] -> [8, 12, 16]; Mooncake EP8 [4, 8, 12, 16]
-> [12, 16]. The TP8 arm is untouched. 14 configs down to 10.

中文:移除运行 31207046020 中失败的四个 TP8/EP8 点(显存驻留 c1、c4,Mooncake c4、
c8)。这些并非引擎故障——各点请求错误率均为 0%,失败于 AIPerf 的画像覆盖率门槛
(ProfileMetricCoverageError,TTFT 覆盖率 95.0%–97.6%,低于要求的 98.0%):在长上下文
智能体语料下,低并发时一小时画像窗口内启动的会话过少,TTFT 无法采样至窗口末端。

该边界单调且仅影响 EP8 分支:纯 TP8 在包括并发 1 在内的所有点均通过,而 EP8 需分别
从并发 8(显存驻留)与并发 12(Mooncake)起才能通过——这也正是专家并行开始产生实际
收益、而非在近乎空批次上承担全互联开销的起点。保留这些点只会导致每次扫描重复失败。

显存驻留 EP8 由 [1, 4, 8, 12, 16] 调整为 [8, 12, 16];Mooncake EP8 由 [4, 8, 12, 16]
调整为 [12, 16];TP8 分支不变。配置数由 14 降至 10。

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant