Conversation
|
FYI, SDDL will receive some important upgrades for next OpenZL release, notably an ability to interpret formats with optional fields and sections, alongside substantial speed optimizations. Unfortunately, the sddl spec in this PR also requires the more advanced This capability is well within sddl scope though, and planned for later this year. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Long term, we want to support OpenZL.
This is a prototype written with Claude, but Claude says that little of the SDDL format is actually implemented, so we cannot express (yet) our data format.
@Cyan4973