Repository navigation
test(roster): post-development acceptance matrix and calibration campaign #414
Description
Roster Test: fresh improvement baseline
Current campaign: eve-post-development-20261011
EASY LIVE SUBSET COMPLETED at 1d53bda: 3/3 final-candidate reviewed deliveries, pending human evaluation. Earlier failed attempts retained below. Only difficulty-1 samples executed; medium/hard, publication, concurrency and full calibration remain deferred.
Initial easy candidate SHA: c57b0d3. Repair candidate: 57d07bd; attempts remain attributed to their actual individual SHA, not retroactively rebased evidence. The pre-development anchor was 9f80afa032e83d84276da2161ae47b5c2bd25290; it is not a frozen post-development result.
Required contracts: 61b97b3e93e670a675c0301cce5412c73404d179.
Clean improvement branch: agents/eve-test-panel-improvements-20261011.
Fresh worktree: D:\oss\github-agent-roster.worktrees\eve-test-panel-improvements-20261011.
This is a new campaign, not a fix or erasure of known failures. Prior evidence and
human evaluations remain intact. The previous updated EVE matrix results
remain historical observations. Old candidate fingerprints do not identify this baseline.
Current Build repairs #487 (historical #441 lock ownership) and #488 (historical #454 critic recovery) must be reviewed/integrated before operational readiness is claimed.
Engineering-baseline requirements carried forward in #489 (historical #469) remain applicable:
verify mission context on every outbound call, repository rules, skills and seat memory,
without widening tools or human-owned policy. No model calls, implementation, publication,
destructive cleanup or AI-Eval were performed by this reset.
Project: https://github.com/users/R4yHarris/projects/3 (Roster Test).
Roster Build remains separate. Profile default remains aperture-qwen; old run IDs
and exactly-once markers are retained and never reused for the fresh campaign.
Matrix
| Scenario | Spec | Required outcome | Mode | Priority | Acceptance prerequisites | Issue | Fresh result | Fresh evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT-01 | 5.1 | App-authored delivery and measured publication attribution | Live App | P0 | RT-04, RT-10, RT-13 | #415 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-02 | 5.1 | Default-deny authority and protected-surface refusals | Offline | P0 | None | #416 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-03 | 5.1 | Trusted trailer checks and publication permission failures | Live App | P0 | RT-02 | #417 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-04 | 5.2 | Cross-platform installation, onboarding and endpoint discovery | Cross-platform | P0 | None | #418 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-05 | 5.2 | Fleet recommendation, locked models and evidence-backed routing | Live model | P0 | RT-04, RT-17 | #419 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-06 | 5.2 | Seat staffing and per-profile concurrency admission | Mixed | P1 | RT-04 | #420 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-07 | 5.3 | Ask classification and bounded-slice planning | Mixed | P0 | RT-04 | #421 | Pending review (easy subset only) | Reviewed samples; human evaluation absent |
| RT-08 | 5.3 | Feature child issues, waves and dependency readiness | Mixed | P1 | RT-07 | #422 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-09 | 5.3 | Scope expansion, re-estimation and bounded escalation | Mixed | P1 | RT-07, RT-02 | #423 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-10 | 5.4 | Documentation and code slices through the complete execution stack | Live model | P0 | RT-04, RT-07 | #424 | Pending review (easy subset only) | Reviewed samples; human evaluation absent |
| RT-11 | 5.4 | Pre-write checkpoints, rewind and exact-worktree resume | Mixed | P1 | RT-10 | #425 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-12 | 5.4 | Parallel children and best-of-N attempt isolation | Live model | P2 | RT-06, RT-08, RT-13 | #426 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-13 | 5.5 | Per-check review truthfulness and unchanged-review publication gate | Mixed | P0 | RT-02, RT-10 | #427 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-14 | 5.5 | Review repair convergence and independent perspective | Live model | P1 | RT-13, RT-05 | #428 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-15 | 5.5 | Verification gates, test exceptions and default-off deployment | Mixed | P0 | RT-10, RT-13, RT-03 | #429 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-16 | 5.6 | Reconcile durable runs, retries, journals and published history | Offline | P0 | None | #430 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-17 | 5.6 | Genuine human evaluations, difficulty ceilings and learning feedback | Human calibration | P0 | RT-10, RT-16 | #431 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-18 | 5.6 | Repeatable multi-model calibration and delivery scorecard | Human calibration | P1 | RT-05, RT-15, RT-17 | #432 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-19 | 5.7 | CLI and terminal-interface acceptance parity | TTY | P0 | RT-04, RT-07, RT-10 | #433 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-20 | 5.7 | Live rail, streaming, steering and cancellation behavior | TTY | P1 | RT-19 | #434 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-21 | 5.7 | Read-only shell diagnostics and opt-in research controls | Mixed | P1 | RT-19, RT-02 | #435 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-22 | 5.8 | Crash recovery, dead-owner locks and task time limits | Recovery | P0 | RT-11, RT-16 | #436 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-23 | 5.8 | State cleanup, reclone continuity, retention and curated memory | Recovery | P1 | RT-16, RT-22 | #437 | Not run | Not run |
| RT-24 | 5.8 | Vault, redacted observability and honest performance accounting | Offline | P0 | RT-02, RT-16 | #438 | Not run | Not run |
Fresh execution protocol
- Check the frozen candidate fingerprint and record the exact Ask, interface, platform, model, configuration and run/seat IDs.
- Re-execute the named business behavior and negative cases; do not copy previous verification results.
- Record failure/recovery honestly. Every attempt in this new campaign stays visible; do not erase a fresh failure with a later pass.
- Demonstrate a distinct comparable Ask on the same candidate before declaring repeatability. Maximum two authorized aperture-qwen tasks concurrently.
- Review all original required cases. Publication, platform/TTY and genuine human-evaluation gates cannot be replaced with fixture results.
- Update only the new campaign rows and fields. A successful subcase is not whole-scenario acceptance.
Evidence and counting contract
- A TEST issue is a scenario, not a runnable implementation slice or an individual run. Do not send this issue wholesale to
roster run; create an explicitly approved bounded disposable task for model-backed scenarios. - Record exact interface (
CLI,TTY, library, or fixture), scenario ID, test case, actual command/flags, baseline/full revision, OS/Node, run ID, durable seat-occurrence IDs, timestamps and monotonic duration. - Record actual served model/provider, effort, fleet profile, declared hardware/context, response-backed input/output tokens, verification command/exits, review verdict/artifact hash, and PR/SHA when applicable. Missing fields remain
unknown; do not include credentials, raw prompts, source bodies or model transcripts. - Keep independent milestones: attempted; execution ended (terminal event and outcome); verified; reviewed; published/merged; human evaluated. A later stage does not retroactively invent earlier evidence.
Execution endedincludes failure/cancellation/unverified outcomes; only passing verification and review count toward those denominators. A documented expected refusal can pass a negative test without being a successful delivery.- Count unique run IDs for invocations; preserve retries as distinct seat occurrences. Deduplicate repeated journal snapshots and duplicate merge trailers. Ambiguous legacy session labels stay ambiguous.
- Planning-only pauses, deterministic stubs and automated/mock fixture passes do not count as model-backed delivered slices, live interface acceptance or human calibration samples.
- Result is
Not run | Pending review | Pass | Fail | Blocked | Spec decision.Pending reviewrecords successful observations awaiting human evidence acceptance; it does not certify all mandatory cases. Evidence stage is the highest evidenced stage, not a claim that every previous gate passed. Overall scenario Pass requires all mandatory cases and human review of the evidence. - Fixtures and actual operational observations are reported separately. Record each platform/profile/variant row; do not hide a failed or missing required variant behind an aggregate pass.
- A human alone supplies AI-Eval and actual minutes. GitHub comments are not automatically imported; use the supported local evaluation writer when staffing should learn.
Per-observation template
Scenario / case:
Observation ID / date:
Interface / exact command:
Repository fixture / starting commit / Roster revision:
OS / Node / contracts revision:
Run ID / seat occurrence IDs:
Requested and served model / provider / profile / effort:
Declared hardware / context:
Observed usage / timing:
Attempted:
Execution ended: terminal event + outcome, or unknown
Verification: actual command / exit / skip / exception
Review: verdict / completion / artifact reference
Publication: PR / SHA / required checks / author / merger, or not requested
Human evaluation: exact target / verdict / difficulty / minutes, or absent
Expected vs observed:
Result: Pass / Fail / Blocked / Spec decision
Redacted evidence links:
Defect or spec-decision issue:
Human reviewer:
Safety and separation
A TEST issue or this matrix alone does not authorize model calls, spend, publication, recovery injection or cleanup. Apply the operator's explicit execution authorization and limits; do not infer new capabilities from a test card.
Execution requires an operator-approved disposable repository/worktree, explicit profile/sample/time/cost limits and a named cleanup target. Use only non-credential sentinels and kill only a known owned PID. Do not test destructive recovery against this working repository. Never edit vendor sources, human policy or workflows.
App publication requires complete credentials and the reviewed contracts publisher from the feature worktree root. No human-credential publication fallback. Stop on Checks-permission HTTP 422.
Roster Test tracks acceptance and calibration; Roster Build tracks implementation. TEST issues are not added to Roster Build. If a scenario exposes a defect, create a separate narrowly scoped Build issue, cross-link it, and rerun this scenario after the fix. Do not turn a failing acceptance issue into product implementation.
Calibration protocol
Start with safety/offline cases, then a real docs slice and code slice per interface, then evaluate those exact runs with a human. Only then test evaluation-backed staffing.
RT-18 requires at least three distinct docs tasks and three distinct code/test tasks per approved model/profile under equivalent frozen specifications and starting revisions. Human approves profiles, budgets and corpus before execution. Counterbalance order; record reviewer config, all failures, repairs, unavailable metrics and genuine human ratings.
Report acceptance/review yield with denominators, defects, rework, observed timing, estimate error and returned usage. Local hardware is declared, not benchmark throughput or dollars. Do not automatically change saved defaults or policy from calibration.
New-campaign observations
No previous-run observation is carried forward. New updated-system runs and fresh validation will be recorded separately, after their actual outcome is known.
Post-development readiness gate
- Required development PRs are reviewed, integrated and cross-linked; retained carry-forward gaps in initiative(eve): reconcile carried-forward requirements after backlog reset #489 are triaged.
- Final full candidate SHA, contracts pin, configuration/behavior bundle and evaluator version are frozen.
- Ray approves the corpus, disposable target, profiles, concurrency and time/cost limits.
- Platform, installed CLI/TTY, publication and human-evaluation cases retain their original requirements.
- Explicit instruction to begin the round is recorded; this reset does not authorize execution.
Archived disposable calibration cards and historical comments remain preserved. The 24 scenario issues #415-#438 are the only executable acceptance definitions, each still requiring its own prerequisites and authorized bounded tasks.
Easy progression authorization
Ray requested plain-text Asks, easy actual runs first, bounded failure-driven repairs and increasing difficulty only after reliable delivery. Initial samples E1 (Git guide), E2 (marketing design/setup regression) and E3 (tiny add utility plus tests), sequential with saved local configuration. No publication/deployment. Each live sample has a ten-minute deadline plus existing seat/repair budgets; a timeout is a recorded failure, not permission to continue indefinitely. This is a delivery diagnostic subset, not completion of RT-04/RT-07 prerequisites or RT-10/RT-18/RT-19 acceptance. All unmet prerequisites remain open; do not mark a scenario Pass from these samples.
Advance only after independent artifact/check verification and human evaluation. Track attempt count, successful checks, review outcome, rework, elapsed time, returned model/usage and missing measurements. No world-leading claim without controlled comparisons. Project scale-out remains GitHub issue dependency waves, isolated writers and capacity admission, not a second queue or runtime.
Easy live progression: observed results
| Sample | Task | Candidate | Seconds | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | local-6c812b414308e124 | c57b0d3 | 162.6 | Failed before coder: critic protocol repair rejected JSON; repaired in #494/#495. |
| E1 | local-6895d9516fdf5d92 | 7e46115 | 165.3 | Failed before coder: proposed documentation checks rejected by action/content guard; not waived. |
| E2 | local-768f52ec4c6d2e39 | 7e46115 | 130.8 | Documentation created; model reviewer pass; independent content inspection; no suite run or human rating. |
| E3 | local-4a0d628808a59490 | 7e46115 | 49.2 | Failed in coder: empty function name, no product edits/tests/review; repaired in #496/#497. |
| E3 | local-709dc96db336bb60 | 7e46115 | 601.3 | Utility and seven tests written; scoped tests pass; cancelled at ten-minute deadline during final repository-wide verification; no reviewer. |
5 actual attempts, 1 reviewed documentation delivery, 0 human-accepted tasks. This is not a controlled model benchmark or full-scenario Pass. Approximate cumulative live wall time: 18.5 minutes; repair/test/CI time excluded. Returned models differ across attempts: E1 glm-5.3-flash; E2/E3 Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B-FP8. Saved requested model remains qwen3.8-27b; no model/default config changed. No cost/throughput or physical hardware identity inferred.
Two observed protocol defects implemented/reviewed/App-merged: #494/#495 (71 targeted tests pass) and #496/#497 (13 targeted tests pass). #495 first CI attempt hit known parallel-test 30s timeout; isolated 5/5 plus one CI retry passed. Original CI failure retained, no test gate weakened.
Open progression blockers: #498 (easy documentation planning) and #499 (minimal consumer/code verification latency and scope decision). Latest installed clean candidate 57d07bd. No live sample has yet validated this latest coder repair. Medium/hard, simultaneous workers, publication/deployment and full calibration remain deferred. Scenario prerequisites and human evaluation remain unmet; no AI-Eval fabricated.
Next: replay the minimal consumer code case and unchanged documentation case; repair actual failures, measure repeated easy task yield/rework/latency, then obtain human ratings. Raise difficulty only after both documentation and code delivery reliably pass. Later project scale-out uses linked GitHub issue waves, capacity admission, one writer per isolated worktree, read-only review and App-only merge; integrate and evaluate dependency scheduling, context/memory continuity and hardware/model admission before enabling simultaneous execution. No new task database or competing runtime.
Easy round completed: repaired candidate 1d53bda
Final candidate: 1d53bda. Latest easy corpus: 3/3 reviewed deliveries; human acceptance: 0.
| Sample | Task | Seconds | Independent evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| E1 Git guide | local-7eb90c3d474755df | 33.2 | File inspected: branches/worktrees distinction, two read-only PowerShell listing examples, illustrative-only disclaimer. Docs tests skipped. |
| E2 Marketing design/setup | local-c6fe041dacfc2baf | 110.5 | Two Markdown documents inspected: one-page layout/style/copy and domain/static-host/local-preview instructions. Docs tests skipped. |
| E3 Add utility/tests | local-9036d7bf2cbc3fdc | 63.8 | Actual final node --test passed; independent Node20 rerun 7/7 including baseline, plus both-argument invalid-input guards. One ordinary test repair retained. |
All 16 attempts below are retained; overall yield across changing candidates/placements is not the final-candidate yield or a controlled benchmark.
| Sample | Started UTC | Candidate | Seconds | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:07:22.202Z | c57b0d3 | 162.6 | Failed: Plan critic revision failed: LLM planner tool-call error after one retry: Repair did not emit valid tool_calls. Unverified stub; coding and publication are disabled. |
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:17:22.851Z | 7e46115 | 165.3 | Failed: LLM planner tool-call error after one retry: Directory documentation requires document-content checks, not installation, deployment, publication, network, purchase or account actions. Unverified stub; coding and publication are disabled. |
| E2 | 2026-10-11T10:20:25.036Z | 7e46115 | 130.8 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E3 | 2026-10-11T10:22:41.392Z | 7e46115 | 49.2 | Failed: LLM coder requested an invalid or unavailable tool: |
| E3 | 2026-10-11T10:24:33.966Z | 7e46115 | 601.3 | Failed: Run cancelled. |
| E3 | 2026-10-11T10:41:12.968Z | 57d07bd | 29.0 | Failed: Coder tool call requires a nonempty function name |
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:42:11.290Z | 57d07bd | 51.8 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E3 | 2026-10-11T10:43:07.981Z | 57d07bd | 54.8 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:46:51.291Z | 909b91e | 22.8 | Failed: LLM planner tool-call error after one retry: Directory documentation requires document-content checks, not installation, deployment, publication, network, purchase or account actions. Unverified stub; coding and publication are disabled. |
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:47:27.518Z | 909b91e | 95.9 | Failed: LLM planner tool-call error after one retry: Directory documentation requires document-content checks, not installation, deployment, publication, network, purchase or account actions. Unverified stub; coding and publication are disabled. |
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:51:32.179Z | 0be0aad | 53.0 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E2 | 2026-10-11T10:52:29.325Z | 0be0aad | 113.3 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E3 | 2026-10-11T10:54:26.527Z | 0be0aad | 52.2 | Failed: Coder tool call requires a nonempty function name |
| E3 | 2026-10-11T10:58:15.528Z | 1d53bda | 63.8 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E1 | 2026-10-11T10:59:31.073Z | 1d53bda | 33.2 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
| E2 | 2026-10-11T11:00:08.382Z | 1d53bda | 110.5 | Reviewed delivery: Reviewer pass; not human accepted |
Repairs and diagnosis
- fix(eve): accept a validated JSON plan during bounded planner protocol repair #494/[agent] accept validated JSON during planner protocol repair #495: JSON protocol correction, 71 targeted tests pass; known CI 30s parallel timeout retained, isolated 5/5 and one CI retry passed.
- fix(eve): repair missing coder tool names without weakening withheld-tool denials #496/[agent] bound correction for missing coder tool names #497: missing tool-name correction, 13 targeted tests pass.
- fix(eve): converge easy documentation plans without weakening action authority #498/[agent] ground documentation checks in artifact contents #500/[agent] validate plain-language documentation content verbs #501: guidance alone did not converge; live diagnostics found missing contrasts/shows content verbs. Root parser fixed, 67 targeted tests pass; operation-success and protected-scope denials remain.
- fix(eve): report inert gateway call placeholders without discarding valid sibling calls #502/[agent] report inert mixed gateway tool placeholders #503: exact empty-name/empty-argument gateway placeholder in mixed batches is visibly denied without losing valid siblings. Nonempty malformed payloads and standalone empty calls still fail safely. 15 targeted tests pass.
- fix(eve): bound easy-code verification latency with an explicit scope decision #499: correct test placement resolves the ten-minute code-verification timeout. Tiny consumer final suite runs its own tests, not the entire Roster suite. No full-suite gate was disabled and no product scope-policy change is needed for this reproduction.
Limitations and progression
Minimal consumer baseline 8864bdb is local, disposable and has no remote; start is current/offline with freshness unknown. Real configured endpoint/models were used, not mocked model fixtures. All consumer runs explicitly warned that provenance events/sessions could not persist without a repository identity. Local logs, artifacts and this observation journal exist; these are not successful durable-history acceptance or a reason to invent a GitHub repository identity. No model default, endpoint, secret or policy changed; returned model labels remain response-backed.
Only easy actual tasks were run. No generated output publication, deployment, medium/hard task, concurrent workers or human AI-Eval. Full RT-07/RT-10 prerequisites and cases still require their own evidence; set Pending review, not scenario Pass/Done. Retain prior Fail observations.
Next difficulty gate: at least three distinct docs and three distinct code/test tasks per eligible profile with equivalent frozen inputs, repeated outcomes, measured review yield/rework/elapsed time and genuine human ratings as RT-18 requires. Current corpus is only two docs plus one code utility; no world-leading or stable multi-model performance claim. Advance one difficulty level at a time after that gate, not from these three green samples alone.
Scale-out gate later: GitHub parent/child issue outcomes and dependency waves; capacity-aware profile/hardware admission; isolated writer worktrees; response-backed context/memory/usage; cancellation/deadline/recovery evidence; independent review; App-only publication/merge. Reconcile #489/#476/#477 before authorizing simultaneous project execution. No new Kanban DB, competing runtime or cognitive role-play substitute for tested behavior.
Activity
R4yHarris commentedon Oct 9, 2026
Roster Test is now configured as a GitHub Projects Kanban matching Roster Build's views and planning fields.
All 25 existing cards were retained and mapped from Todo to Backlog. Result, Evidence stage, priority and scenario metadata were verified unchanged; no acceptance run was executed. No TEST card is associated with Roster Build.
Board: https://github.com/users/R4yHarris/projects/3/views/3
Kanban Status tracks work, not acceptance truth. A human reviews evidence before Done; Result may be Pass, Fail, Blocked or Spec decision. Build's auto-close/merge-driven workflows were deliberately not copied. No assignees, estimates or sprint dates were invented. The project README documents the workflow and views.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 10, 2026
Updated EVE matrix: fresh candidate results
Fresh campaign eve-matrix-9f80afa-20261010; candidate 9f80afa, contracts 61b97b3e93e670a675c0301cce5412c73404d179. Windows, Node v20.20.2. Original matrix protocol #414; previous 28044dd observations are not carried forward.
Full existing suite: ROSTER_TEST_JOBS=2; npm exec --yes --package=node@20 -- node scripts\run-tests.mjs. Exit 0; 171 files, 1593 tests, 1586 passed, 0 failed, 7 skipped; 784.0s wall. Nine 60-second file-budget warnings retained. This is fresh fixture/regression evidence, NOT whole-scenario operational acceptance, idle benchmark or human AI-Eval. Missing platforms, actual TTY, multi-model corpus and publication variants are not replaced with fixtures.
Evidence stage denotes the highest evidenced subcase only; it does not certify every required gate. Human evaluation/reviewer: absent. No TEST issue was sent wholesale to roster run; no policy/workflow/vendor edits, saved-default changes, deployments or disposable-product publication. Board: https://github.com/users/R4yHarris/projects/3
Live experiments and harness audit
Initial four isolated observations used
aperture-qwen, with auto-routing andpublication disabled, one invocation each, a 15-minute AbortSignal, turn budget
12 and a 48-request bound. They inadvertently ran Node24; none certifies Node20.
All observations remain visible.
run-a8d2d55c1a6cb2e5run-dc4277955e260f08run-d0b45dbb87df30f9Files allowed:instead of the recognized Markdown heading.run-a6884671b23805dbThe initial harness also discarded exception messages. Exact historical exceptions
cannot be recovered and are not invented. Deterministic retained-artifact validation
identifies the missing declaration but does not retroactively recover the original
exception. Response-backed token counts were not retained and remain unknown.
Caller revision and saved configuration/fleet hashes remained unchanged.
Two additional corrected observations verified Node
v20.20.2for both therunner and child processes. The same profile and limits were retained; reviewer
was explicitly required in the in-memory configuration. Six total invocations
were authorized and recorded; no initial observation was erased.
run-7fa44029db0aa092/local-50eda387b97fa20brun-4c8f5e36773fb268/local-da2afe9d44f90ffdPlan critic revision cannot change the Ask or widen the file allow-list. No code or test files delivered.The docs run is not first-pass success: its first coder occurrence failed
with two denied reads, followed by one automatic perspective continuation within
the same top-level invocation. Its durable occurrences measured planner 13.164s,
failed coder 71.748s, continued coder 30.861s and reviewer 8.560s.
Documentation checks intentionally executed zero tests; a skip is not exit zero.
Docs artifacts:
matrix-design/design.md, SHA-2569f445591e08fa15edcd356d97c16716e33dbf71390d68f64c1e255fa08e5c1d1.matrix-design/local-preview-setup.md, SHA-2564ca02cfedf25c063ee2f150c2d758919a1bd2f6e3ab12b4bd3153868d12ba415.0b17996602b946a267da41083e3b7527730e0a870583d38c0df7d813a41a7876.Served model:
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B-FP8; registered hardware declarationrtx-6000-ada-48gb, context capacity 262144. This hardware is a profile declaration,not proof of physical hardware or measured throughput.
Recorded response-usage event sums, including failed/auxiliary calls:
These sums are not the compact per-seat last-response AI-Run token slots, and
neither measure price. The initial four observations have unknown retained usage.
On the two correctly configured Node20 live observations, reviewed-delivery yield
is 1/2 (50%), first-pass delivery yield is 0/2, and live code verification
count is zero. Human acceptance is absent, not a measured rejection or 0% score.
This small single-profile sample is not RT-18 multi-model calibration.
The code failure reproduces the failure class tracked by existing
#454.
The scope guard stopped an invalid revision rather than granting wider authority;
the delivery path still failed to produce the requested code. Do not weaken
Ask/scope validation to improve the score.
Corrected evidence: eve-rt10-corrected-observations.json,
SHA-256
AAD314829C3C131BD5D916CB6A9C0BD04D5BEF4B24C323C0857B459674DFAA76.Supplementary evidence: eve-rt10-observations.json.
Disposable task trees and durable outcomes are retained; no output was published.
RT-22: confirmed negative-case failure
Fresh public
acquireRepoLockprobes on Node20 used disposable records, notoperational worker locks:
Probe runner exit 0 is not a passing negative case. This reproduces the existing
Build defect #441;
no duplicate defect or product fix was created.
Fresh observations were posted to RT-22
and #441.
The owned fixture was removed; no real process was killed or operational lock changed.
No whole-scenario human-accepted Pass is claimed. Prior campaign history and original acceptance checks are unchanged.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 11, 2026
Fresh improvement campaign reset: eve-improvements-fresh-20261011
All 24 scenario items reset to Backlog / Not run / Evidence Not run. Local campaign snapshot has zero attempts and no accepted scores. Original checks and prerequisites are unchanged; prior comments, AI-Eval, run records, reports and known failures remain preserved.
Clean worktree:
D:\oss\github-agent-roster.worktrees\eve-test-panel-improvements-20261011Branch:
agents/eve-test-panel-improvements-20261011Starting revision:
9f80afa032e83d84276da2161ae47b5c2bd25290Contracts:
61b97b3e93e670a675c0301cce5412c73404d179The main checkout is behind origin/main and has uncommitted AGENTS.md and Copilot-instruction changes. It was NOT reset, updated or discarded. Old worktrees/branches and generated products were not deleted. Future improvement/testing should use the new clean worktree and new run IDs, not old failed task trees.
This reset does not repair #441 or #454 or declare Eve operationally accepted. Both remain open Build priorities. No models, tests, deployments or publications were invoked; private aperture-qwen default stays intact. Spec: FEATURE_SPEC 5.6 and 5.8, honoring sections 3 and 7.
[-]TEST: Roster feature acceptance matrix and calibration protocol[/-][+]test(roster): post-development acceptance matrix and calibration campaign[/+]29 remaining items
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 11, 2026
Acceptance fidelity repair and actual easy results
#522 head f208b8c is App-authored, open and non-draft.
Final trusted Linux Node20 CI: 1720/1720 pass,0 failures,0 skips,52333ms runner time; trailer check passes.
Spec5.3/5.4/5.5 respecting3/7, scoped #521.
Shared strict validation rejects oversize NEW planner checks rather than silently truncating at240characters.
Reading existing tasks preserves full normalized checks, including legacy long acceptance-continuation obligations.
Initial full CI exposed that genuine compatibility gap; fixed without changing the original long-check fixture.
Affected Node20 planning/context/checklist/layout142total141pass1existing skip0fail81.4s.
Final observed document-content wording coverage plus boundaries/context/layout68/68pass.
Covering, gives instructions and indexes content phrasing now recognized; command/action-success assertions remain denied.
Actual easy E2 evidence, all retained rather than cherry-picked:
Gateway served GLM for requested Qwen throughout these replays. No private config, endpoint, routing or timeout changed; no comparable local-Qwen speed claim.
Both #520 and #522 remain publication-blocked by pinned reviewed contracts SDK immediate post-push stale-head checks.
Real App follow-up commits pushed; no dummy/duplicate commit, direct merge, human fallback, vendor patch or policy/workflow change.
SDK lacks resume-only mode. Separate dependency repair authorization was unavailable, not assumed.
Installed persistent clean checkout remains5202946 (#518); neither green PR is claimed merged/installed.
Overall reliable easy delivery, efficient end-to-end functionality, human AI-Eval, cross-platform and harder/concurrent gates remain incomplete.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 11, 2026
Verified bounded oversized-check correction
#522 newest App head3d7aedc088f8bcb0c6a0308cd8000a184f5fcbda: trusted Linux Node20 full1721/1721pass,0fail,0skip,64211ms runner time. Trailer check passes.
New exact20-turn regression established oversized TASK rewriting consumed the full budget.
Only that observed length-error path now uses its existing single validation correction immediately; still-invalid correction stops after two requests.
Existing changed-Ask/protected-path/selected-model rejection and successful rewrite contracts unchanged.
Targeted Node20 planner/acceptance/task/plan-mode/layout63/63pass4.8s.
Spec5.3/5.4/5.5 respecting3/7, no runtime deps/store, private config or authority changes.
Newest actual easy E2 local-4c41ceabafca57db completed in396751ms with review pass after one repair.
Independent readback confirms design layout/copy/style/accessibility and setup guide with HTML starter, concrete Netlify manual-upload controls and GitHub push/Pages branch-root settings, public URLs, DNS/HTTPS, costs and illustrative placeholders.
Every rendered check is complete and within240characters; original Ask remains unchanged.
This is an observed reviewed delivery, not human acceptance or reliable corpus-wide performance.
Mixed responses remain visible: planner/coder Qwen, reviewer GLM, earlier requests also GLM aliases. Missing coder usage stays unknown; no single-model speed comparison.
All earlier failures remain recorded, including malformed62541ms and prior600s diagnostic abort.
Capture driver now reports clone-stream errors immediately so diagnostic aborts cannot become unhandled promises; no aborted run is relabeled success.
#520 and #522 remain OPEN/non-draft with green checks, not merged/installed.
App publisher again pushed genuine repair then rejected immediate stale PR-head response; no resume-only mode.
No duplicate/dummy commit, human or direct merge, vendor patch or policy/workflow bypass.
User unavailable to authorize separate contracts-repository repair; no permission inferred.
Persistent installed checkout remains clean5202946 (#518).
Higher/concurrent difficulty and human evaluation gates remain unsatisfied.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 11, 2026
Copilot integration research/backlog (separate initiative)
Dedicated initiative #569: #569
Dependency-ordered slices: #570 #570; #571 #571; #572 #572; #573 #573
ProjectV2 assignment/status could not be completed with the Roster repository installation. No board status is claimed; issues request Backlog until a human with project access adds them. This initiative is separate from #418's DEFERRED gate and #414's unchanged acceptance. Full sources, feasibility recommendation, measurable criteria and human gates are in #569.
Key blockers: human decision on Node >=20 and zero-runtime-dependency exception; bounded Roster inference versus distinct full-agent worker; explicit account/license/policy/model/data-transfer and finite AI-credit budget approval; org-admin approval of Copilot Requests App permission/enablement/installation scope if server-to-server is selected. No code or live model tests were run.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Authorized offline RT-11 subset — NOT full scenario acceptance
Ray authorized specific acceptance batches2026-10-13T14:43:42. Frozen OBSERVATION candidate0652c2c0fb09051544e89b19efe3a7022f93a563, contractsfa48c244bc9b8ead5df927ec705ef41a39c56f68; not finalwholecampaignfreeze. Node20.20.2 Windows. Exact command:
node --test --test-reporter=tap tests\checkpoints.test.mjs tests\verified-checkpoint.test.mjs tests\checkpoint-interruption.test.mjs
39/39 PASS0fail0skip0cancel59978.0021ms. Disposable automated fixture subprocesses only; no live inference/auth/spend/publish. Existing tests directly exercise pre-write scope hook, stash-free tree restoration/index/artifactpreservation, capturednewproductremoval, published/unavailable-PRsafe refusals, activewriter/cancel refusal, changedpost-testsource, greenrestoration/archivedstaleverification, interruptedshellgreenresume, rollbackIOfailure and retainedlock. Parentinstalledworktree unchanged/clean.
Evidence stage: automated FIXTURE SUBSET, not live operator acceptance. #424 prerequisite remainsunaccepted; full exactregistered-worktree public operational resume and genuine humanrating stillneedtheirrequired evidence. Do not markRT-11Pass/Done, wholecampaignReady or treatgreen39tests as dischargedalloriginalchecks. No testsource/product edit. Existing failures retained. Spec§§5.4/5.8 honors3/7.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Authorized offline review-gate subset — 2026-10-13
Explicit scoped-batch authorization from Ray2026-10-13T14:43:42, renewedcontinuation15:07. Observationcandidatef3bb779123dc73f1d52e278e2e0ca4b3510de7e5; contracts0050ada. WindowsNode20.20.2. Exactcommand:
node --test --test-reporter=tap tests\reviewer.test.mjs tests\reviewer.defects.test.mjs tests\builtin.review-repair.test.mjs tests\builtin.publication.test.mjs
Observed90total/89pass/0fail/1skip/0cancel/267590.3935ms. Retainedlog authorized-review-gates-batch-20261013.log. Disposable automated fixtures; scriptedseatresponses/mockpublisher, no liveinference/billing or actualgenerated-productpublication. Any Dockeroptinskips are notexecutedbackendproof.
Controls cover per-check/malformed/negativeaudit grounding, read-onlyreview, boundedrepair, publicissue hostverification forwarding, failed/mutatedreview publicationrefusal, explicitbypass and declared-scope staging. Scope of evidence is this selector, not alloriginaloperatorprocedures/platforms or humanacceptance. Prerequisites#416/#424 remainunaccepted; do notmark#427/#428PassDone orfullcampaignexecuted. Product/librarysource unchanged; noAI-Eval fabricated. Existingfailures retained. Spec§§5.4/5.5/5.6 honors3/7.
Separate read-onlyAppgrant recheckstillHTTP422 at resume-scoped tokenmint; nofallback/retrywithlessscope/PRmutation. Reviewedrepair delivered; human AppAdministrationread installationgrant remains required for#596. No liveCopilot implementation or fullheldoutpilot claimed.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Authorized profile-admission fixture subset
Ray scopedofflinebatchauthorization2026-10-13 renewed17:19. OBSERVATIONcandidatef3bb779123dc73f1d52e278e2e0ca4b3510de7e5 contracts0050ada; Node20.20.2 Windows. Exactcommand:
node --test --test-reporter=tap tests\coder.scope.test.mjs tests\admission.test.mjs tests\llm.admission.test.mjs tests\route.admission.test.mjs
23/23PASS0fail0skip0cancel7233.8903ms. Validcommandexit0; precedingversionprobe failedonmistypedbinarypath, no runtimeinstall or defaultswitch. Fileauthorized-authority-admission-20261013.log retained. Scopecontrol in this selector is specificallyscratchcreate/delete accounting, NOT allprotectedpathauthority checks.
Admissionfixtureproof: concurrency2/FIFO, separateprofilequeues, queuedabortnoleak, one-shotownedrelease/detachedlisteners, failedrequestslotrelease, directseatchats sharingprofilelimit, busyroutewithoutquarantine/failover; evalhistory outranksqueuedepth. Saveddefaultwithoutfleetprofile intentionallynotlimited. Testsarecontrolledoffline endpoints, not measuredproductionthroughput/distributedadmission/hardwareproof.
RT-06 fullstaffing/skills/heartbeat/alloperatorcases and RT-04prerequisite remainoutstanding; noPassDone/humanrating. No model/spend/publish calls, productsourcechange or fullcampaignexecution. Spec§§5.2/5.4/5.8 honors3/7. Actualcodeproofslice#611 runsindependentlytest-only; no liveCopilotcontainmentclaim.
Read-onlyAppdiagnostic confirms configuredr4yharris-agent-coder installationadministration:null checks:read; tokenmintHTTP422 permissionsnotgranted. Ray's reportedgrant retained but effectiveAPIpermissionnotyetvisible; nofallback/consumerPRmutation.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Authorized offline recovery/retention development subset
Prior scoped offline-batch authorization; not full deferred campaign execution.
Candidate de6447d, contracts0050ada,
Windows Node20.20.2. Exact selector:
node --test --test-reporter=tap tests\repo-locks.test.mjs tests\provenance-recovery.test.mjs tests\repo-state.retention.test.mjs tests\paths.retention.test.mjs tests\clean-ops.isolation.test.mjs
100 tests PASS, 0 failures/skips/cancellations, 2017.6672ms, exit0.
Five files / 47 top-level tests plus nested tests, not 100 independent operator
scenarios. Log authorized-recovery-retention-subset-20261013.log retained.
Disposable fixtures; no live provider request, account credential handoff,
publication, external worker termination or historical data cleanup.
Lock/provenance fixtures verify atomic writer admission, injected dead-owner
recovery, live-holder refusal and incomplete torn-completion preservation.
Retention/scope fixtures verify exact expiry boundary, unknown-age refusal,
separate roots and guarded cleanup isolation. Injected owner-death proof is not
a real killed-worker/resume test. Retention policy results are not complete
reclone/memory-promotion/operator evidence.
RT-22 still needs prerequisites RT-11/RT-16 and approved actual owned-process
interruption, slow endpoint/task cap and exact-task resume. RT-23 still needs
its prerequisites and full reclone, migration/rollback and human-approved memory
promotion procedure. No scenario Pass/Done, candidate freeze or AI-Eval claimed.
Spec5.4/5.6/5.8 respects3/7. New physical-boundary permission request unavailable;
no approval inferred and no container/CLI install/credentials/live calls made.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Authorized offline history/provenance subset
Candidate a9af3e6 / contracts0050ada.
Windows Node20.20.2; prior scoped offline-batch authorization.
Exact command:
node --test --test-reporter=tap tests\history-query.test.mjs tests\history-robustness.test.mjs tests\local-runs.provenance.test.mjs tests\builtin.provenance.test.mjs
40 tests PASS, zero failures/skips/cancellations, 114055.2167ms, exit0.
Four files, 38 top-level tests plus nested tests. Log retained as
authorized-history-reconciliation-subset-20261013.log. No live inference,
credential handoff, consumer publication or historical data deletion.
Scripted transport drives builtin seat fixtures; Git operations are confined
to disposable fixture repositories, not human publication.
Fixture evidence includes actual local checkout deletion/reclone and linked
worktree cleanup with unchanged machine record bytes, origin identity
separation, explicit history-store selection/read-only queries, malformed
record visibility, response-backed served model/observed zero tokens and
unknown stub usage rather than inherited metrics. No claim that these four
files establish every repeated-snapshot/merge-trailer deduplication case.
RT-16 still needs frozen time bounds, actual repository-relevant legacy/journal/
published inventory and evidence-only distinct task/invocation/seat/delivery
reconciliation plus genuine acceptance. No full operator scenario Pass/Done,
campaign freeze or AI-Eval. Related RT-23 reclone control is fixture evidence
only; migration/rollback and human memory promotion remain outstanding.
Spec5.6/5.8 respects3/7; no product/policy/workflow/dependency changes.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Actual read-only history inventory, separate from fixtures
Candidate/ref a9af3e6, contracts0050ada,
Windows Node20.20.2. Time bounds 2026-10-11T00:00:00Z through
2026-10-13T22:17:22.891Z for durable stores; Git attribution end
2026-10-13T22:19:07.709Z (commit time, NOT model execution time).
Explicit current origin-derived repository identity only; historical identities
are not guessed/reassigned. Read-only existing reader/exporter/learning helpers;
no recover/append/repair/lock takeover, model call or history cleanup.
Machine session events: planner8/coder4/reviewer2/unknown2.
Served-model counts: glm-5.3-flash7, Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B-FP8 7, unknown2;
requested qwen3.8-27b13/unknown3. Two prompt and two completion usage fields
absent/unknown; zero observed-zero fields. No aggregate bill constructed.
Committed log-file bytes unchanged across each read; zero store-wide skipped
records. This is reader stability evidence, NOT freezing future active writers.
Local journal schema evidence: excellence3/delivery10/recorded delivery review
verdict1/bounded attempt0/local evaluation rows0. Inventory v2 corrects v1's
wrong top-level verification/review-field query; v1 was not published as evidence.
No absent measurements backfilled. Journal timestamps not assumed.
Persisted redacted JSON reports: roster-history-inventory-20261013.json and
roster-journal-inventory-20261013-v2.json in session files. No raw prompts,
source bodies, auth, journals or commit messages exposed here.
Remaining RT-16: retained consumer/worktree seat JSONL, archived operational
logs and independently verified published-PR subjects, identity transitions,
actual task/invocation/seat/delivery crosswalk and genuine human acceptance.
This bounded actual inventory is NOT the full deferred operator round,
scenario Pass/Done, pilot acceptance or difficulty promotion. Spec5.6/5.8
respects3/7. App resume still independently blockedHTTP422/Adminnull; no bypass.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 13, 2026
Authorized offline parallel/attempt isolation subset
Ray renewed continuation and installation grant; prior offline-batch approval
applies. Installation authorization is not an effective GitHub permission grant
or a live inference/authentication approval. No installation was needed here.
Candidate a9af3e6, contracts0050ada,
Windows Node20.20.2. Exact selector:
node --test --test-reporter=tap tests\attempts.test.mjs tests\builtin.parallel.test.mjs tests\wave-scheduler.test.mjs tests\waves.test.mjs
33/33 PASS, zero failures/skips/cancellations, 75898.2952ms, exit0.
Log authorized-parallel-attempts-subset-20261013.log retained.
Real disposable Git worktrees with scripted seat transport: overlapping
isolated children, bounded wave capacity, failure preserving siblings,
dependency refresh after closure rather than model approval, cancellation
controls and bounded best-of-N selection. Candidate TASK identity, deterministic
gate/review eligibility, tie-breaking and winner-only measured coder attribution
are fixture controls; mock publisher is not an actual App publication.
No live provider requests, account credential handoff, paid model experiment,
production auth isolation, new dependency, policy/workflow edits or consumer
publication. Full RT-12 remains gated by RT-06/08/13 prerequisite acceptance and
its separately approved live-profile/operator round. No scenario Pass/Done,
human AI-Eval or difficulty promotion. Spec5.2/5.4/5.5/5.8 respects3/7.
Current installation diagnostic still reports r4yharris-agent-coder
Administration:null / Checks:read; required resume scope HTTP422. Original
#596 commit preserved, no reduced permission or human-credential fallback.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Project reconciliation 2026-10-14, following Ray's report of stale cards:
Board edits were performed with the available user-authorized project-management gh session, not presented as App-authored code publication. Evidence comments use the App identity. Code publication remains App-only.
Exact #617 final CI: 2065 total, 2062 pass, 0 fail, 3 skips, 76349.325385ms. Windows coupled: 144/144 pass. Current exact-SHA App resume still HTTP422; acceptance of required installation read permissions is separate from tooling-install authorization. No permission workaround.
No new test round, live inference or pilot executed by this reconciliation; no human AI-Eval or full Eve completion invented.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Additional verified project reconciliation 2026-10-14:
RT-06 (#420), RT-11 (#425), RT-12 (#426), RT-13 (#427) and RT-14 (#428) now also show In progress / Evidence Attempted, based on their existing authorized subset observations. Full Results stay Not run. Each issue retains the original candidate, selector, counts, skips and outstanding operator/prerequisite conditions.
Together with #418/#430/#436/#437, nine stale Test workflow cards are reconciled. #421/#424 remain In review / Pending review / Reviewed. No acceptance or human evaluation fabricated; no new live round executed. The project README now distinguishes current evidence from its historical reset.
r4yharris-agent-coder commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Human-language acceptance direction — Ray, 2026-10-14
Moving forward, exercise Roster with the human's verbatim natural-language asks rather than well-declared, machine-generated GitHub issues. Preserve original wording, typos, implicit context and requested deliverables. Do not supply synthetic Allowed Files or acceptance scaffolding before the observed attempt. Roster must interpret, plan, execute and review, or ask only genuinely necessary clarification.
GitHub issues/project cards remain evidence records, not a replacement input language. Record candidate revision, endpoint/model, original ask, visible output/artifacts, review outcome, actual elapsed time and exact failpoint; preserve unsuccessful attempts. Machine fixtures remain development regressions, not substitutes for these acceptance observations. No Pass/Done or genuine human AI-Eval may be invented.
Ray directed repair task #616 Done pending this retest approach. #617 is green but still unmerged; do not test an old installed revision and attribute the outcome to the uninstalled patch. First verify the tested checkout's revision and whether it includes a161bd7.
This records the next-round method only; no new inference/test campaign executed or prior failures erased.
R4yHarris commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Native Rust + OpenShell & Easy/Medium/Hard (M1–M3) Gauntlet Verification — 2026-10-24
Candidate: merged in PR #682 following PR #680 (
bb430e9). Contracts submodule:0050ada.1. Live Multi-Model Easy (
M1), Medium (M2), and Hard (M3)roster.exe shellDelivery GauntletM1, difficulty 1–2 — Documentation & OpenShell slice):aperture-qwen(qwen3.8-27b, servedlocal-inference-lab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4-MXFP8-CSF-QAD)local-b3b5a37ca66c4355/roster-b84d1a605ae029a0AI-Run:1|local|local-inference-lab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4-MXFP8-CSF-QAD@-|m|22761/262144|486|roster-b84d1a605ae029a0|local-b3b5a37ca66c4355AI-Run:1|local|local-inference-lab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4-MXFP8-CSF-QAD@-|m|6798/262144|250|roster-b84d1a605ae029a0|local-b3b5a37ca66c4355697b9334ec179c259b1c705b8eb565e81a463108583b0c3bd93aea1d14adbe0dMode: verified,Review: pass(2m11s).M2, difficulty 3 — Code + Node 20 TAP Test slicesrc/slug.mjs+tests/slug.test.mjs):aperture-dsv4(deepseek-v4-flash, served76348ddb2be2e35e39ecfc00e75dc07703f4f3d5)local-e4d24fa61476bec1/roster-53714e90d3564622node --testexit0(4/4pass, Red/Green2/2fail -> pass, Self-reviewclean)AI-Run:1|local|76348ddb2be2e35e39ecfc00e75dc07703f4f3d5@-|m|31338/1048576|1434|roster-53714e90d3564622|local-e4d24fa61476bec1AI-Run:1|local|76348ddb2be2e35e39ecfc00e75dc07703f4f3d5@-|m|8628/1048576|7520|roster-53714e90d3564622|local-e4d24fa61476bec14712b6cb606dbdfc1d9d75c141f34d1a21f5373a3e8f039dd768a102a94d86d6Mode: verified,Review: pass(16m20s).M3, difficulty 4–5 — Multi-Constraint RFC-4180 CSV Parsersrc/csv.mjs+tests/csv.test.mjs):aperture-qwen(qwen3.8-27b, servedlocal-inference-lab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4-MXFP8-CSF-QAD)local-630f2f3513185544/roster-9a50064726795934node --testexit0(12/12pass, Red/Green12/12fail -> pass: quoted commas, escaped"", embedded LF/CRLF inside quotes,SyntaxErroron unterminated quote at EOF)AI-Run:1|local|local-inference-lab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4-MXFP8-CSF-QAD@-|m|234000/262144|3975|roster-9a50064726795934|local-630f2f3513185544AI-Run:1|local|local-inference-lab/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-NVFP4-MXFP8-CSF-QAD@-|m|13776/262144|691|roster-9a50064726795934|local-630f2f3513185544122ce166c9d4117eb23289f6af182a8cb1d14db223b7cfddb7ac9e9aa3b18c06Mode: verified,Review: pass(8m41s).2. Native Rust & OpenShell (
RT-25) Suite Resultscargo fmt --all -- --check: PASScargo clippy --all-targets --locked --offline -- -D warnings(Rust1.99.1& MSRV1.85.0): PASScargo test --lib --locked --offline: 594 / 594 passed (0failed)cargo test --test cli --locked --offline: 13 / 13 passed (0failed, includingcli_openshell_doctor_reports_offline_blockers_and_rejects_unknown_flags)