[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#96407 Document importing merchant rules via spreadsheet#96544
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Nicolás Bonet <NicolasBonet@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
HelpDot Documentation ReviewOverall AssessmentThis PR adds a single new article, docs/articles/new-expensify/workspaces/Import-Merchant-Rules.md, documenting how Workspace Admins bulk-create Merchant Rules via spreadsheet import and how Tag cells are interpreted for single-level vs. multi-level tags. It is the docs counterpart to #96407. The article is well-scoped to one primary workflow and closely follows the governance files. All 75 added lines are net-new content. Scores Summary
Key Findings
Recommendations
Files Reviewed
Note: Detailed line-by-line feedback has been provided as inline comments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e08924eca3
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Co-authored-by: {"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"} <{"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"}@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Co-authored-by: {"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"} <{"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"}@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Co-authored-by: {"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"} <{"message":"Not Found","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#get-an-issue-comment","status":"404"}@users.noreply.github.com>
|
A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://94f274a2.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️ Updated articles: |
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/stephanieelliott in version: 9.4.44-0 🚀
|
Summary
Adds a new help site article documenting how Workspace Admins import Merchant Rules using a spreadsheet, and how Tag cells are interpreted for single-level vs. multi-level tags.
This is the docs counterpart to #96407, which fixed how a
X: YTag cell is normalized during merchant rule import. The spreadsheet-import flow (and the tag-interpretation behavior that PR touches) was previously undocumented — the existing Merchant Rules article only covers creating rules manually.What's added
New article
docs/articles/new-expensify/workspaces/Import-Merchant-Rules.mdcovering:Parent: Child→ Level1Parent, Level2Child, spaces trimmed); on single-level tag lists a colon stays part of the tag name (ab:cd→ one tagab:cd). This documents the behavior fixed in [CP Staging] Fix imported merchant rule tag corruption for X: Y (multi-level) tag format #96407.UI label verification
All feature names, menu items, and buttons were verified against the current UI strings in
src/languages/en.tsand rendered with exact casing: More, Import merchant rules, Merchant is, Merchant contains, Updated merchant, Updated category, Updated tag, Updated description, Import, and the Rules page.Authoring compliance
Follows
docs/TEMPLATE.md,docs/HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md, anddocs/HELPSITE_NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md: single primary workflow, one#title, task-based##headings, verified UI labels in Sentence case, relative cross-links placed outside numbered steps.@NicolasBonet, please review the files changed and confirm they reflect the current behavior. Then mark this PR
Ready for review.