Skip to content

feat: Support of new radio DRO1 by DumboRC - #6076

Closed
FreedomLJS wants to merge 88 commits into
EdgeTX:mainfrom
FreedomLJS:main
Closed

FreedomLJS wants to merge 88 commits into
EdgeTX:mainfrom
FreedomLJS:main

Conversation

@FreedomLJS

@FreedomLJS FreedomLJS commented Apr 11, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

DRO1 is a new product from DumboRC, which is committed to creating the best user experience for users.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features
    • Added support for the DumboRC DRO1 transmitter, including firmware build targets, registration, and board selection.
    • Added DRO1 hardware configuration: device naming/USB descriptors, display/touch (GT911) setup, and supported options (including Lua/FLEX and RF module settings).
    • Updated the module UI to show the 5 volts warning where applicable.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Prevented font decompression from failing when font data is missing.
  • Chores
    • Updated build/test and nightly automation to include the DRO1 target.

@richardclli richardclli changed the title The first submission of the DRO1 device code originating from DumboRC. feat: Support of new radio DRO1 by DumboRC Apr 13, 2025
@wimalopaan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Are there any informations about this radio available?

@wimalopaan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@FreedomLJS Are there any further infos about the DR01 (tech specs, release date, ...)?

@3djc

3djc commented Aug 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Since it is a F4 radio, it cannot be merged anymore anyway

@wimalopaan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since it is a F4 radio, it cannot be merged anymore anyway

Ok, thanks for that info!

FreedomLJS and others added 28 commits July 6, 2026 00:30
@pfeerick

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

For reference, given this is a STM32 F4 based handset/radio, this will not be merged. Per our development roadmap there would be no more STM32F4 designs accepted as of v2.12, so at best this could have been part of 2.11 but we did not get sufficient communication around the time that would have been viable (i.e. the couple of months around when this PR was opened). You are perfectly entitled to continue to maintain this via a fork, and support your customers that way, but please be explicitly clear when doing so to state they are not running a "official" EdgeTX build, but rather your own build. If you wish to work with us on something using a supported MCU architecture in the future, please do not hesitate to reach out (i.e. through @richardclli or our Discord server).

@pfeerick pfeerick closed this Sep 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants