[CI] Bump LLM validation platform to v0.1.2

[NachoEchevarria]

Summary of changes

Bump the pinned LLM Validation Platform ref from v0.1.1 (0f48ca3) to v0.1.2 (d59e4af) in .gitlab-ci.yml — both the include: ref and the "llm validation" job's LLMVAL_PLATFORM_REF, kept identical per the platform's supply-chain pinning guidance. Plus a one-character punctuation fix in AGENTS.md.

Reason for change

Keep the prompt-regression gate on the latest released, immutably-pinned platform version. v0.1.2 brings:

• Fail loudly on an unresolvable base ref instead of silently comparing against an empty baseline (across the CLI and both shell layers).
• Advisory expected-criteria coverage in the report (gate verdict unchanged).
• Fixes: always send the gateway Authorization header; confine candidate-file resolution to the repo root; validate --repo before the candidate-absent degenerate-skip.

Implementation details

Test coverage

Other details

Full changelog: https://github.com/ddoghq/llm-validation-platform/compare/v0.1.1...v0.1.2

[pr-commenter]

LLM Validation

LLM Validation Gate — dotnet-tracer-agent

✅ PASS

• No blocking-case regressions; the quality change is within noise (baseline/candidate confidence intervals overlap).

Analysis

Changed instruction file(s): AGENTS.md.

1 case(s) dipped but stayed within the pass bar.

• dotnet-tracer-control-context-propagation-016 (advisory): won 41% of blind comparisons, quality -2.2.
  • Asked: When the .NET tracer auto-instruments an outbound HttpClient call, how does it propagate the active trace context to the downstream service — which headers
  • Baseline answer: When the .NET tracer auto-instruments an outbound HttpClient call, it injects trace-context headers at the point where the request is about to be sent, using the propagator styles configured for the tracer. Here's how it works. ## Where injection happens The native profiler hooks the underlying message handler's
  • Candidate answer: The parallel exploration confirms my answer in full and adds two useful details worth appending: - tracestate contents (W3C): beyond traceparent, the tracestate header embeds Datadog-specific keys in its dd= section — sampling priority (s), origin (o), and last-parent id (p). - Baggage caps: the

Results

• Pairwise win-rate: 50% [46%–54%] — candidate's share of blind comparisons (90% CI; spanning 50% = no clear difference)
• Overall quality: 89.0 → 88.2 (/100, -0.8)
• Bad signals introduced (advisory): 0
• Candidate criteria coverage (advisory): 20/20 (100%) — expected_criteria the candidate met; does not affect the gate
• Blocking-case regressions: 0

Cases

Case	Mode	Quality Δ	Win-rate (90% CI)	Safety
dotnet-tracer-repo-nav-integration-001	block	-1.0	47% [42%–52%]	ok
dotnet-tracer-logging-terminology-004	block	-0.5	50% [42%–58%]	ok
dotnet-tracer-nuget-scope-hallucination-008	block	-0.2	50% [50%–50%]	ok
dotnet-tracer-confirm-instrumentation-011	block	-0.1	62% [47%–78%]	ok
dotnet-tracer-control-context-propagation-016 🟡	warn	-2.2	41% [32%–49%]	ok

_{Per-dimension scores, token usage, latency, and estimated cost are in the CI job logs.}

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-04 10:08:40

Comparing candidate commit 9faa8e8 in PR branch nacho/BumpNewLLmPlatformVersion with baseline commit 34861f3 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 28 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 42 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 108 known flaky benchmarks, 18 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+28985.442op/s; +31131.101op/s] or [+18.281%; +19.635%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+39537.492op/s; +44115.768op/s] or [+16.458%; +18.364%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartActiveSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+33348.204op/s; +35195.360op/s] or [+18.082%; +19.083%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+24712.146op/s; +27157.084op/s] or [+15.894%; +17.467%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+39549.081op/s; +42886.370op/s] or [+16.368%; +17.749%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartRootSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+34170.382op/s; +36041.056op/s] or [+19.043%; +20.086%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+23159.921op/s; +24419.577op/s] or [+14.600%; +15.394%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+45867.689op/s; +50092.854op/s] or [+19.336%; +21.117%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+35766.510op/s; +37633.586op/s] or [+20.035%; +21.080%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+28261.541op/s; +30544.885op/s] or [+18.649%; +20.155%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+33518.373op/s; +36222.984op/s] or [+14.203%; +15.349%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_GetCurrentSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+31846.356op/s; +33097.160op/s] or [+17.335%; +18.016%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-9.746%; -9.740%]
• 🟩 throughput [+21587.368op/s; +23305.847op/s] or [+14.963%; +16.154%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+36020.994op/s; +37858.961op/s] or [+16.522%; +17.365%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TracerBenchmark.StartSpan_SetActive netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+21011.423op/s; +22839.123op/s] or [+11.995%; +13.039%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

• 🟥 throughput [-36216.209op/s; -32189.964op/s] or [-10.200%; -9.066%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

• 🟥 throughput [-5830.275op/s; -5080.540op/s] or [-6.656%; -5.800%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-232 bytes; -231 bytes] or [-12.363%; -12.356%]
• 🟩 throughput [+22769.301op/s; +24131.466op/s] or [+13.509%; +14.317%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.885%; -5.878%]
• 🟩 throughput [+44962.814op/s; +51106.341op/s] or [+17.847%; +20.286%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.704%; -5.697%]
• 🟩 throughput [+23842.292op/s; +26265.614op/s] or [+12.240%; +13.484%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-232 bytes; -231 bytes] or [-10.594%; -10.586%]
• 🟩 throughput [+25601.749op/s; +26687.245op/s] or [+17.437%; +18.176%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+39916.954op/s; +43370.718op/s] or [+17.937%; +19.489%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-31.573ms; -8.772ms] or [-15.763%; -4.379%]
• 🟩 throughput [+26995.462op/s; +29738.370op/s] or [+15.711%; +17.307%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-12.408%; -12.401%]
• 🟩 throughput [+22255.453op/s; +25303.592op/s] or [+13.714%; +15.592%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.885%; -5.878%]
• 🟩 throughput [+45595.393op/s; +50249.000op/s] or [+18.079%; +19.924%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.704%; -5.697%]
• 🟩 throughput [+28808.504op/s; +31456.727op/s] or [+15.408%; +16.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-9.681%; -9.674%]
• 🟩 throughput [+13812.652op/s; +15265.546op/s] or [+10.164%; +11.234%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+24976.868op/s; +26911.712op/s] or [+12.350%; +13.307%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+13786.388op/s; +15829.027op/s] or [+8.525%; +9.788%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-12.408%; -12.401%]
• 🟩 throughput [+23818.799op/s; +24847.078op/s] or [+14.130%; +14.740%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.885%; -5.878%]
• 🟩 throughput [+36001.427op/s; +39658.803op/s] or [+13.788%; +15.189%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.704%; -5.697%]
• 🟩 throughput [+23954.062op/s; +27674.196op/s] or [+12.348%; +14.266%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-232 bytes; -231 bytes] or [-12.363%; -12.356%]
• 🟩 throughput [+25645.397op/s; +27028.005op/s] or [+15.817%; +16.669%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.885%; -5.878%]
• 🟩 throughput [+42119.173op/s; +46138.635op/s] or [+16.621%; +18.207%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.704%; -5.697%]
• 🟩 throughput [+22814.161op/s; +25328.710op/s] or [+11.857%; +13.164%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+22927.923op/s; +24109.866op/s] or [+14.697%; +15.454%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+24960.250op/s; +30961.966op/s] or [+10.232%; +12.692%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+32302.149op/s; +36246.736op/s] or [+18.318%; +20.555%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-10.083%; -10.076%]
• 🟩 throughput [+16844.385op/s; +18504.061op/s] or [+12.173%; +13.372%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+26593.766op/s; +29224.231op/s] or [+12.351%; +13.572%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+24335.856op/s; +25780.141op/s] or [+14.551%; +15.414%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+29800.758op/s; +31633.760op/s] or [+20.013%; +21.244%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+30248.154op/s; +33350.809op/s] or [+12.901%; +14.224%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+31562.787op/s; +33059.963op/s] or [+17.612%; +18.447%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-232 bytes; -231 bytes] or [-7.475%; -7.467%]
• 🟩 throughput [+15110.787op/s; +15917.672op/s] or [+14.079%; +14.831%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+16119.506op/s; +18921.980op/s] or [+10.437%; +12.252%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+11898.879op/s; +13009.330op/s] or [+9.090%; +9.938%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-232 bytes; -231 bytes] or [-9.183%; -9.175%]
• 🟩 throughput [+10323.295op/s; +12367.852op/s] or [+7.898%; +9.463%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+23910.403op/s; +26822.964op/s] or [+12.300%; +13.798%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+22502.112op/s; +23530.662op/s] or [+15.021%; +15.707%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.214%; -11.207%]
• 🟩 throughput [+25691.864op/s; +27066.133op/s] or [+17.789%; +18.740%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.504%; -5.497%]
• 🟩 throughput [+27562.708op/s; +31108.742op/s] or [+12.045%; +13.594%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.341%; -5.333%]
• 🟩 throughput [+21834.673op/s; +25022.872op/s] or [+12.758%; +14.621%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-233 bytes; -232 bytes] or [-11.664%; -11.656%]
• 🟩 throughput [+21755.019op/s; +24025.176op/s] or [+14.101%; +15.573%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.794%; -5.786%]
• 🟩 throughput [+35781.608op/s; +39190.665op/s] or [+14.723%; +16.125%]

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-88 bytes; -87 bytes] or [-5.618%; -5.610%]
• 🟩 throughput [+31227.260op/s; +33641.552op/s] or [+17.077%; +18.397%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

• 🟥 throughput [-8115.272op/s; -7704.572op/s] or [-9.622%; -9.135%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 throughput [-9458.451op/s; -8240.613op/s] or [-9.617%; -8.379%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.605KB; +1.605KB] or [+48.760%; +48.776%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+309.518ms; +312.001ms] or [+153.594%; +154.826%]
• 🟥 throughput [-58.076op/s; -54.016op/s] or [-10.449%; -9.719%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.011KB; +1.011KB] or [+37.485%; +37.498%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+377.427ms; +378.425ms] or [+298.191%; +298.979%]
• 🟩 throughput [+65.275op/s; +66.990op/s] or [+8.606%; +8.832%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.090KB; +1.090KB] or [+40.417%; +40.429%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+400.003ms; +402.564ms] or [+353.987%; +356.254%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.726KB] or [+99.482%; +99.497%]
• 🟥 throughput [-60384.557op/s; -60003.701op/s] or [-46.982%; -46.686%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-16.489ms; -12.321ms] or [-7.701%; -5.754%]
• 🟥 throughput [-60426.907op/s; -57658.581op/s] or [-44.108%; -42.088%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
• 🟥 throughput [-48972.892op/s; -46726.702op/s] or [-44.277%; -42.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
• 🟥 throughput [-294783.937op/s; -291832.726op/s] or [-30.099%; -29.798%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-26.034ms; -21.139ms] or [-11.610%; -9.427%]
• 🟥 throughput [-118199.392op/s; -94847.978op/s] or [-12.627%; -10.133%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
• 🟥 throughput [-165885.478op/s; -149637.912op/s] or [-23.835%; -21.500%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
• 🟥 throughput [-72345.357op/s; -71575.927op/s] or [-48.688%; -48.170%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
• 🟥 throughput [-72769.962op/s; -69890.908op/s] or [-46.302%; -44.470%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
• 🟥 throughput [-56191.369op/s; -53554.946op/s] or [-44.764%; -42.663%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+277307.161op/s; +317640.732op/s] or [+9.247%; +10.592%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-18.560ms; -14.222ms] or [-8.556%; -6.556%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.576ms; +301.408ms] or [+150.188%; +150.604%]
• 🟩 throughput [+949.620op/s; +993.434op/s] or [+10.488%; +10.972%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+299.363ms; +311.051ms] or [+150.970%; +156.864%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2216.968op/s; +2559.429op/s] or [+16.956%; +19.576%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• unstable execution_time [+273.371ms; +293.978ms] or [+137.703%; +148.083%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1803.808op/s; +1929.967op/s] or [+17.415%; +18.633%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+296.433ms; +297.215ms] or [+145.596%; +145.980%]
• 🟩 throughput [+564.745op/s; +574.942op/s] or [+14.972%; +15.242%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+295.589ms; +297.144ms] or [+144.502%; +145.263%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2759.800op/s; +2831.326op/s] or [+40.095%; +41.134%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.842ms; +303.285ms] or [+150.860%; +151.581%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1411.656op/s; +1449.300op/s] or [+28.020%; +28.767%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-146.627µs; -142.037µs] or [-30.105%; -29.162%]
• 🟩 throughput [+849.636op/s; +881.491op/s] or [+41.381%; +42.933%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-137.809µs; -111.202µs] or [-31.607%; -25.504%]
• 🟩 throughput [+849.948op/s; +971.003op/s] or [+36.952%; +42.215%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-144.786µs; -122.790µs] or [-31.021%; -26.308%]
• 🟩 throughput [+796.187op/s; +879.047op/s] or [+36.754%; +40.579%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-127.699µs; -122.909µs] or [-34.478%; -33.184%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1352.294op/s; +1413.236op/s] or [+50.083%; +52.340%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-102.821µs; -79.246µs] or [-32.826%; -25.299%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1192.905op/s; +1393.779op/s] or [+37.186%; +43.448%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-137.696µs; -115.284µs] or [-37.668%; -31.537%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1328.521op/s; +1466.559op/s] or [+47.675%; +52.629%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.580ms; +300.386ms] or [+149.521%; +149.923%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+417.498ms; +425.111ms] or [+453.629%; +461.901%]
• 🟩 throughput [+749.046op/s; +921.056op/s] or [+6.155%; +7.568%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+237.432ms; +305.157ms] or [+180.280%; +231.703%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• unstable execution_time [+271.402ms; +339.499ms] or [+124.788%; +156.098%]
• 🟥 throughput [-600.376op/s; -540.257op/s] or [-54.400%; -48.953%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+204.373ms; +337.607ms] or [+87.095%; +143.874%]
• 🟥 throughput [-674.039op/s; -590.490op/s] or [-44.959%; -39.386%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+341.771ms; +353.637ms] or [+204.418%; +211.516%]
• 🟥 throughput [-410.960op/s; -371.072op/s] or [-28.615%; -25.837%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-183.834µs; -166.203µs] or [-9.312%; -8.419%]
• 🟩 throughput [+46.745op/s; +52.144op/s] or [+9.228%; +10.294%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+303.346ms; +305.016ms] or [+152.759%; +153.600%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.544ms; +308.907ms] or [+150.102%; +154.794%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.500ms; +304.432ms] or [+150.959%; +152.934%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.859ms; +302.613ms] or [+151.081%; +151.962%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.619ms; +309.859ms] or [+148.148%; +153.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+304.874ms; +309.090ms] or [+154.524%; +156.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.187ms; +300.769ms] or [+150.165%; +150.959%]
• 🟥 throughput [-23969.477op/s; -21080.975op/s] or [-6.218%; -5.469%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.934ms; +309.585ms] or [+150.985%; +154.300%]
• 🟩 throughput [+45963.909op/s; +56227.970op/s] or [+9.127%; +11.165%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.349ms; +303.387ms] or [+149.421%; +150.932%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 throughput [-21522.975op/s; -17843.263op/s] or [-8.655%; -7.175%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-17.385ms; -13.678ms] or [-8.084%; -6.360%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

• unstable execution_time [+11.975µs; +55.104µs] or [+2.958%; +13.611%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.480KB; -19.456KB] or [-7.106%; -7.097%]
• unstable execution_time [+34.065µs; +142.570µs] or [+6.733%; +28.178%]
• unstable throughput [-343.907op/s; -69.897op/s] or [-17.161%; -3.488%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-36.937µs; +23.796µs] or [-6.401%; +4.124%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+11.529µs; +16.598µs] or [+27.251%; +39.232%]
• 🟥 throughput [-6763.212op/s; -4822.530op/s] or [-28.471%; -20.301%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-14.872µs; -7.818µs] or [-23.073%; -12.130%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1910.467op/s; +3421.185op/s] or [+11.721%; +20.990%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.973ms; +304.421ms] or [+153.139%; +153.871%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.720ms; +304.004ms] or [+153.065%; +154.737%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.454ms; +304.293ms] or [+150.915%; +152.336%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+33398.151op/s; +41341.520op/s] or [+6.322%; +7.825%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+298.922ms; +301.498ms] or [+148.985%; +150.269%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.373ms; +303.130ms] or [+151.335%; +152.218%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.867ms; +304.299ms] or [+153.088%; +154.321%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.358ms; +300.443ms] or [+149.321%; +149.862%]
• 🟩 throughput [+66065353.967op/s; +66426721.281op/s] or [+48.113%; +48.376%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+420.581ms; +426.635ms] or [+523.067%; +530.597%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.051ms; +300.358ms] or [+149.160%; +149.812%]
• 🟩 throughput [+18221406.235op/s; +19206680.362op/s] or [+8.071%; +8.507%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

• 🟥 throughput [-103103.055op/s; -91228.767op/s] or [-11.506%; -10.181%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

• 🟥 throughput [-119320.680op/s; -110084.625op/s] or [-10.922%; -10.077%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+74622.964op/s; +106837.270op/s] or [+5.776%; +8.269%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 throughput [+57047.244op/s; +64767.896op/s] or [+5.666%; +6.432%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

• 🟥 throughput [-32721.153op/s; -29769.623op/s] or [-7.290%; -6.633%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+45469.057op/s; +51771.505op/s] or [+8.256%; +9.401%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

• 🟥 throughput [-74430.495op/s; -68458.178op/s] or [-10.893%; -10.019%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+71693.729op/s; +93463.972op/s] or [+8.010%; +10.442%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1