Skip to content

Update Timer_List_T.cpp#2545

Open
okan-nako wants to merge 1 commit into
DOCGroup:masterfrom
okan-nako:overflow_id_counter_
Open

Update Timer_List_T.cpp#2545
okan-nako wants to merge 1 commit into
DOCGroup:masterfrom
okan-nako:overflow_id_counter_

Conversation

@okan-nako

@okan-nako okan-nako commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since increasing id_counter_ can lead to an overflow, we propose adding an overflow check.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes

  • Improved timer identifier assignment to prevent counter overflow issues during long-running scheduling, resulting in more reliable timer behavior over time.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7cf94c10-96cb-47cf-ba31-8ce3a109b3c5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d97f224 and ff9f4d7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ACE/ace/Timer_List_T.cpp
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • ACE/ace/Timer_List_T.cpp

Walkthrough

The PR protects timer ID allocation in ACE_Timer_List_T::schedule_i against counter overflow by replacing unbounded post-increment with a guarded increment that resets the counter to 0 at LONG_MAX.

Changes

Timer ID Allocation Safety

Layer / File(s) Summary
Guarded timer ID allocation with wraparound
ACE/ace/Timer_List_T.cpp
Timer ID counter protection changes from id_counter_++ to guarded increment that wraps to 0 when id_counter_ reaches LONG_MAX.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

A counter climbed, then paused to see,
If LONG_MAX was the boundary.
It wrapped to zero, light and bright—
A tiny fix that feels just right 🐰

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is related to the changed file, but it is too generic to convey the overflow-safe counter update. Rename it to mention the main change, such as adding overflow handling for ACE_Timer_List_T::schedule_i id_counter_.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity

Metric Results
Complexity 0

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Comment thread ACE/ace/Timer_List_T.cpp
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

  • Queue this pull request

Since increasing id_counter_ can lead to an overflow, we propose adding an overflow check.
@okan-nako okan-nako force-pushed the overflow_id_counter_ branch from d97f224 to ff9f4d7 Compare June 26, 2026 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants