Skip to content

[EXPERIMENT] Introduce TypingMode::Codegen to avoid layout cycles#145477

Draft
cjgillot wants to merge 4 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
cjgillot:codegen-mode
Draft

[EXPERIMENT] Introduce TypingMode::Codegen to avoid layout cycles#145477
cjgillot wants to merge 4 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
cjgillot:codegen-mode

Conversation

@cjgillot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot commented Aug 16, 2025

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Aug 16, 2025
@cjgillot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2025
[EXPERIMENT] Introduce `TypingMode::Codegen` to avoid layout cycles
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 16, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 16, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 34dd67f (34dd67f42f0f2050c773b332e2dd333618c22743, parent: cd7cbe818e4a66d46fe2df993d1b8518eba8a5cd)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (34dd67f): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.2%, 3.3%] 58
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.8% [0.0%, 19.4%] 58
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.3%, -0.0%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.5% [0.2%, 3.3%] 58

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.4%, secondary 4.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.7% [0.5%, 7.3%] 17
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.4% [1.2%, 12.3%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.4%, -1.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.4% [-1.4%, 7.3%] 19

Cycles

Results (primary 2.9%, secondary 4.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.3% [2.1%, 12.0%] 12
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.0% [-4.0%, -4.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.9% [2.9%, 2.9%] 1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary -1.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.1%, 0.6%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.1%, 0.4%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.0% [-0.0%, -0.0%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.8% [-7.1%, -0.1%] 5
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [-0.0%, 0.6%] 5

Bootstrap: 469.562s -> 472.464s (0.62%)
Artifact size: 377.55 MiB -> 377.67 MiB (0.03%)

@rustbot rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Aug 16, 2025
@cjgillot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2025
[EXPERIMENT] Introduce `TypingMode::Codegen` to avoid layout cycles
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 16, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 16, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 4e9488c (4e9488c147d4057600076145eccb670b130147d5, parent: 2e2642e641a941f0a1400c7827fd89aa86fef8f4)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4e9488c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.2%, 0.9%] 23
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.5% [0.1%, 9.7%] 59
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.6% [-1.6%, -1.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.3% [-0.3%, -0.3%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [-1.6%, 0.9%] 24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.7%, secondary 5.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.9% [0.5%, 7.5%] 19
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
6.6% [0.4%, 12.9%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.7% [-1.3%, 7.5%] 20

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.2% [2.1%, 10.2%] 8
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.0% [-3.8%, -2.2%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary -1.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.1%, 0.4%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.0% [-0.0%, -0.0%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-6.8%, -0.0%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [-0.0%, 0.1%] 4

Bootstrap: 470.222s -> 472.094s (0.40%)
Artifact size: 377.51 MiB -> 377.42 MiB (-0.02%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 16, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 23, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #145469) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Oct 17, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: aff7f6c (aff7f6cd45cf2531b19fd593b68884e34a5c8752, parent: a41214f9bd7ce869d21898f31107f92c90a9112f)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (aff7f6c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.4% [0.1%, 1.0%] 48
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.7% [0.1%, 9.7%] 48
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.0% [-0.0%, -0.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [0.1%, 1.0%] 48

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.5%, secondary -1.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.8% [0.8%, 10.4%] 10
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.9% [1.9%, 1.9%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.9% [-3.9%, -3.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.5% [-1.3%, 10.4%] 11

Cycles

Results (primary 2.3%, secondary 2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.9% [2.9%, 4.7%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.4% [-2.4%, -2.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1

Binary size

Results (primary 0.0%, secondary -0.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.5% [0.4%, 0.6%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.0% [-0.0%, -0.0%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.9% [-7.5%, -0.1%] 5
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.0% [-0.0%, 0.2%] 4

Bootstrap: 476.516s -> 477.213s (0.15%)
Artifact size: 390.37 MiB -> 390.36 MiB (-0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Oct 17, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 23, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #147793) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@cjgillot cjgillot force-pushed the codegen-mode branch 2 times, most recently from ca9c354 to 480b6d5 Compare May 3, 2026 20:41
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@cjgillot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

cjgillot commented May 3, 2026

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 3, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2026
[EXPERIMENT] Introduce `TypingMode::Codegen` to avoid layout cycles
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented May 4, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 7bf3ad1 (7bf3ad14920af19fbbbe356a5ebb7be3d73010d4, parent: ad3a598ca4bc7c68bcbbce3e0d3be9a7618df190)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (7bf3ad1): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.2%, 1.2%] 75
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [0.2%, 9.8%] 81
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.4% [-0.7%, -0.3%] 7
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.5% [-0.1%, 1.2%] 76

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.6%, secondary 1.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.6% [0.7%, 4.3%] 12
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [0.4%, 6.7%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.4% [-1.6%, -1.1%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.6% [0.7%, 4.3%] 12

Cycles

Results (primary -3.0%, secondary 2.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.0% [0.5%, 8.9%] 18
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.0% [-3.5%, -2.5%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.6% [-0.7%, -0.5%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) -3.0% [-3.5%, -2.5%] 2

Binary size

Results (primary 0.3%, secondary -0.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.4% [0.3%, 0.5%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.9% [-7.3%, -0.1%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 1

Bootstrap: 495.343s -> 498.406s (0.62%)
Artifact size: 394.42 MiB -> 395.17 MiB (0.19%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 4, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. label May 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-clippy Relevant to the Clippy team. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants