There are some reported issues where users don't get the pattern they expect because of some detail in how the detector-sample geometry is set up or how the orientations are defined (I include myself in "users"!). Here're some of them:
It would be good to have a sort of check-list to go through when this happens. Something like double-checking:
- Detector-sample geometry:
- Sample tilt
- Detector tilt
- PC convention
- PC
- Orientation:
- Sample reference frame (90 deg @ [001] between kikuchipy/EMsoft/EDAX -> Bruker/Oxford)
- Angles in degrees or radians
This should be an example in the examples gallery.
There are some reported issues where users don't get the pattern they expect because of some detail in how the detector-sample geometry is set up or how the orientations are defined (I include myself in "users"!). Here're some of them:
It would be good to have a sort of check-list to go through when this happens. Something like double-checking:
This should be an example in the examples gallery.