|
| 1 | +# Guiding principles for copyediting |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +How much of the author's original stylistic choices should a |
| 4 | +copyeditor keep? Here are some guiding principles. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +__Semantics first!__. In general, only keep meaningful features. We typeset content first, not look. |
| 7 | +We preserve emphasis, but we don't preserve an author's choice of a particular |
| 8 | +emphasis style (italics vs small caps vs bold). We preserve numbered list, but |
| 9 | +we don't preserve an author's choice of specific numbering style |
| 10 | +(arab numbers, roman numbers, letters). If authors object, they need to explain |
| 11 | +why their idiosyncratic notation choices are needed (maybe in the paper itself, |
| 12 | +at least to us). |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +__Efficiency__. The semantics first principle is tempered by efficiency considerations. Changing an |
| 15 | +author's square brackets to round ones is easy. Changing their choice of |
| 16 | +LaTeX commands can be error-prone. Redoing their |
| 17 | +figures to use the journal's font can be time-consuming. If an author's |
| 18 | +cohice is too costly for us to change and doesn't heart readability |
| 19 | +and comprehension, we let it pass. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +__Egos__. The principle is also tempered by social considerations. |
| 22 | +If adopting our style proves particulary difficult with an |
| 23 | +author, causing back-and-forth that may delay publication, we |
| 24 | +can cave in. Their paper, their problem, after all. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +__Bibliography__. Dialectica's policy with respect to the bibliography |
| 27 | +has been to enforce our preferences irrespective of efficiency or author's egos. |
| 28 | +For instance, we require that they cite from originals rather than reprints |
| 29 | +(leading to back and forth as they source and check the original), |
| 30 | +that they cite the latest edition of a book, or that they provide more |
| 31 | +specific page ranges. |
0 commit comments