Commit 9596125
committed
Clarify some groups in statmech to avoid sibling bug
It looks like some of these groups were added before we had enabled lone pairs in the Adjlist. As such they tried to incorperate both triplet/singlet and doublet/quartet in the one node. However, this made the tree fail the sibling child/parent check. For now, I have removed the possibility for singlet bi-rads and doublet tri-rads.
Additionally the Nitrites group was just written incorrectly from the start. I have added one extra atom to the Adjlist after consulting with alongd1 parent febe3ef commit 9596125
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 8 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
9 | 9 | | |
10 | 10 | | |
11 | 11 | | |
12 | | - | |
| 12 | + | |
13 | 13 | | |
14 | 14 | | |
15 | 15 | | |
| |||
901 | 901 | | |
902 | 902 | | |
903 | 903 | | |
904 | | - | |
| 904 | + | |
| 905 | + | |
905 | 906 | | |
906 | 907 | | |
907 | 908 | | |
| |||
1244 | 1245 | | |
1245 | 1246 | | |
1246 | 1247 | | |
1247 | | - | |
| 1248 | + | |
1248 | 1249 | | |
1249 | 1250 | | |
1250 | | - | |
| 1251 | + | |
1251 | 1252 | | |
1252 | 1253 | | |
1253 | 1254 | | |
| |||
1329 | 1330 | | |
1330 | 1331 | | |
1331 | 1332 | | |
1332 | | - | |
| 1333 | + | |
1333 | 1334 | | |
1334 | 1335 | | |
1335 | | - | |
| 1336 | + | |
1336 | 1337 | | |
1337 | 1338 | | |
1338 | 1339 | | |
| |||
1391 | 1392 | | |
1392 | 1393 | | |
1393 | 1394 | | |
1394 | | - | |
| 1395 | + | |
1395 | 1396 | | |
1396 | 1397 | | |
1397 | 1398 | | |
1398 | 1399 | | |
1399 | | - | |
| 1400 | + | |
1400 | 1401 | | |
1401 | 1402 | | |
1402 | 1403 | | |
0 commit comments