Skip to content

Commit 4520b47

Browse files
committed
Change a group N3d_OdOs to correct resonance structure in R_Recombination
The group should actual be using the N5d resonance structure. I also added some comments to the family lone_pair_electron_bond which we thought was similar to reactions in question, but actually was quite different and dysfunctional.
1 parent 253c154 commit 4520b47

3 files changed

Lines changed: 19 additions & 6 deletions

File tree

input/kinetics/families/R_Recombination/groups.py

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1430,12 +1430,12 @@
14301430

14311431
entry(
14321432
index = 130,
1433-
label = "N3d-OdOs",
1433+
label = "N5d-OdOs",
14341434
group =
14351435
"""
1436-
1 * N3d u1 {2,D} {3,S}
1436+
1 * N5d u1 p0 c+1 {2,D} {3,S}
14371437
2 Od u0 {1,D}
1438-
3 Os u0 (1,S)
1438+
3 Os u0 p3 c-1 (1,S)
14391439
""",
14401440
kinetics = None,
14411441
)
@@ -1618,11 +1618,11 @@
16181618
L4: N3d-Cd
16191619
L4: N3d-Cdd
16201620
L4: N3d-Od
1621-
L5: N3d-OdOs
16221621
L4: N3d-N3d
16231622
L2: N5_rad
16241623
L3: N5s_rad
16251624
L3: N5d_rad
1625+
L4: N5d-OdOs
16261626
L3: N5t_rad
16271627
L3: N5b_rad
16281628
"""

input/kinetics/families/R_Recombination/rules.py

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2423,7 +2423,7 @@
24232423

24242424
entry(
24252425
index = 600,
2426-
label = "N3d-OdOs;O_rad",
2426+
label = "N5d-OdOs;O_rad",
24272427
kinetics = ArrheniusEP(
24282428
A = (3.5e+12, 'cm^3/(mol*s)'),
24292429
n = 0.24,
@@ -2461,7 +2461,7 @@
24612461

24622462
entry(
24632463
index = 601,
2464-
label = "N3d-OdOs;O_pri_rad",
2464+
label = "N5d-OdOs;O_pri_rad",
24652465
kinetics = ArrheniusEP(
24662466
A = (3e+13, 'cm^3/(mol*s)'),
24672467
n = 0,

input/kinetics/families/lone_electron_pair_bond/groups.py

Lines changed: 13 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,6 +5,19 @@
55
shortDesc = u""
66
longDesc = u"""
77
8+
After review by alongd and nyee, this family looks deprecated or unfinished.
9+
10+
Currently, we expect O atom in RMG to be in triplet, not singlet state.
11+
Therefore this family will never be found by RMG in its current state.
12+
13+
If we naively changed O atom to triplet state for this family, the
14+
entire family would be spin-forbidden
15+
16+
It is likely that this actually occurs through some two-step reaction pathway
17+
through an exicted triplet state.
18+
19+
NRRR + O(T) <=> ONRRR(T)
20+
ONRRR(T) + M <=> ONRRR(S) + M
821
"""
922

1023
template(reactants=["N3sRRR", "O_atom_singlet"], products=["N3sRRRO"], ownReverse=False)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)