Problem Description
Installing the 0.1.9 release from source results in a 0.1.0 package version reported by pip list. Expected 0.1.9? This causes the diffusers library to refuse to use aiten as the backend as it expects a version > 0.1.5
Modifying the fallback version to 0.1.9 before running python3 setup.py develop, results in what I hope is the correct version reported by pip and the diffusers library successfully uses the backend (with a very nice inference speed up).
A similar issue exists when installing directly from the repo master branch.
Is there a step missing for installation that would result in a correct version or has someone forgotten to update the pyproject.toml fallback version before release?
Operating System
Fedora 43
CPU
N/A
GPU
N/A
ROCm Version
ROCm 6.4.4
ROCm Component
No response
Steps to Reproduce
Install from 0.1.9 tar.gz then run pip list and see version is 0.1.0 not 0.1.9
(Optional for Linux users) Output of /opt/rocm/bin/rocminfo --support
No response
Additional Information
No response
Problem Description
Installing the 0.1.9 release from source results in a 0.1.0 package version reported by pip list. Expected 0.1.9? This causes the diffusers library to refuse to use aiten as the backend as it expects a version > 0.1.5
Modifying the fallback version to 0.1.9 before running python3 setup.py develop, results in what I hope is the correct version reported by pip and the diffusers library successfully uses the backend (with a very nice inference speed up).
A similar issue exists when installing directly from the repo master branch.
Is there a step missing for installation that would result in a correct version or has someone forgotten to update the pyproject.toml fallback version before release?
Operating System
Fedora 43
CPU
N/A
GPU
N/A
ROCm Version
ROCm 6.4.4
ROCm Component
No response
Steps to Reproduce
Install from 0.1.9 tar.gz then run pip list and see version is 0.1.0 not 0.1.9
(Optional for Linux users) Output of /opt/rocm/bin/rocminfo --support
No response
Additional Information
No response