Repository navigation
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathgraders.py
More file actions
195 lines (163 loc) · 7.74 KB
/
Copy pathgraders.py
File metadata and controls
195 lines (163 loc) · 7.74 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
"""
graders.py — Execution-Grounded Reward Function
=================================================
What makes this environment unique: reward is computed from REAL
DuckDB execution results, not just keyword heuristics.
Scoring breakdown (sums to 1.0):
Real Execution Speedup 35% — actual timing ratio from DuckDB
Result Correctness 20% — both queries return identical data?
Issue Detection 25% — keyword match vs ground truth
Approval Correctness 8% — correctly flags query as bad?
Summary Quality 7% — is the written analysis thorough?
Severity Labels 5% — are severity values present?
Optional ``GradeMask`` (keyword arg ``mask=``) zeroes components for ablations;
production calls omit ``mask`` (full scoring, including the 0.02 minimum when
appropriate).
"""
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
from executor import get_executor
from models import Action, Reward
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class GradeMask:
"""Toggle reward components (for ablations). All True = production grading."""
execution_speedup: bool = True
result_correctness: bool = True
issue_detection: bool = True
approval_correctness: bool = True
summary_quality: bool = True
severity_labels: bool = True
# ── Helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def _kw_match(text: str, keywords: List[str]) -> bool:
t = text.lower()
return any(kw.lower() in t for kw in keywords)
def _suggestions_text(action: Action) -> str:
parts = [action.summary, action.optimized_query, action.estimated_improvement]
for s in action.suggestions:
parts += [
str(s.get("issue_type", "")),
str(s.get("description", "")),
str(s.get("fix", "")),
str(s.get("severity", "")),
]
return " ".join(parts)
# ── Speedup → score mapping ───────────────────────────────────────────────
def _speedup_score(speedup: float, has_error: bool) -> float:
"""Map real speedup ratio to a score in [0.0, 0.35]."""
if has_error:
return 0.0
if speedup >= 15.0:
return 0.35
if speedup >= 8.0:
return 0.30
if speedup >= 4.0:
return 0.25
if speedup >= 2.0:
return 0.18
if speedup >= 1.2:
return 0.10
if speedup >= 0.9: # slightly slower — acceptable
return 0.04
return 0.0 # regression
# ── Main grader ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def grade(
task_data: Dict[str, Any],
action: Action,
*,
mask: Optional[GradeMask] = None,
) -> Reward:
original_query: str = task_data["sql_query"]
optimized_query: str = (action.optimized_query or "").strip()
ground_truth: List[Dict[str, Any]] = task_data["ground_truth_issues"]
full_text = _suggestions_text(action)
# ── 1. Real Execution (0.0–0.35) ─────────────────────────────────
exec_info: Dict[str, Any] = {}
speedup_sc = 0.0
correctness_sc = 0.0
exec_feedback: List[str] = []
if optimized_query:
try:
ex = get_executor()
exec_info = ex.compare(original_query, optimized_query)
speedup = exec_info.get("speedup", 1.0)
r_match = exec_info.get("results_match", False)
opt_err = exec_info.get("optimized_error")
# 1a. Speedup score
speedup_sc = _speedup_score(speedup, bool(opt_err))
# 1b. Correctness score (0.0-0.20)
if opt_err:
correctness_sc = 0.0
elif r_match:
correctness_sc = 0.20
elif exec_info.get("optimized_rows", 0) > 0:
# Query ran but different results -- partial credit
correctness_sc = 0.05
# Feedback lines
exec_feedback = [
"\n[DuckDB Execution Results]",
f" Original : {exec_info['original_ms']:.1f} ms "
f"({exec_info['original_rows']} rows)",
f" Optimized : {exec_info['optimized_ms']:.1f} ms "
f"({exec_info['optimized_rows']} rows)",
f" Speedup : {speedup:.2f}x",
f" Correct? : {'YES' if r_match else 'NO -- results differ'}",
f" Verdict : {exec_info.get('verdict', '')}",
]
if opt_err:
exec_feedback.append(f" SQL Error : {opt_err[:200]}")
except Exception as exc:
exec_feedback = [f"\n[WARN] Execution engine error: {exc}"]
# ── 2. Issue Detection (0.0–0.25) ────────────────────────────────
detected = 0
detection_fb: List[str] = ["\n[Issue Detection]"]
for gt in ground_truth:
found = _kw_match(full_text, gt["keywords"])
if found:
detected += 1
detection_fb.append(f" [FOUND] {gt['type']} (line ~{gt['line']})")
else:
detection_fb.append(f" [MISS ] {gt['type']} (line ~{gt['line']})")
detection_sc = (detected / len(ground_truth)) * 0.25 if ground_truth else 0.0
# ── 3. Approval Correctness (0.0–0.08) ───────────────────────────
expected_approved = task_data.get("approved_expected", False)
approval_sc = 0.08 if action.approved == expected_approved else 0.0
# ── 4. Summary Quality (0.0–0.07) ────────────────────────────────
summary_sc = 0.0
slen = len(action.summary)
if slen > 50:
summary_sc = 0.03
if slen > 120:
summary_sc = 0.07
# ── 5. Severity Labels (0.0–0.05) ────────────────────────────────
sev_kw = ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]
has_sev = any(
_kw_match(str(s.get("severity", "")), sev_kw) for s in action.suggestions
)
severity_sc = 0.05 if has_sev else 0.0
breakdown = {
"execution_speedup": round(speedup_sc, 4),
"result_correctness": round(correctness_sc, 4),
"issue_detection": round(detection_sc, 4),
"approval_correctness": round(approval_sc, 4),
"summary_quality": round(summary_sc, 4),
"severity_labels": round(severity_sc, 4),
}
# ── Total (optional component mask for ablations) ─────────────────
m = mask or GradeMask()
contrib = {k: (v if getattr(m, k) else 0.0) for k, v in breakdown.items()}
total = round(min(max(sum(contrib.values()), 0.0), 1.0), 4)
if mask is None and total == 0.0 and action.suggestions:
total = 0.02 # minimum signal for any submission (production only)
feedback = "\n".join(
exec_feedback
+ detection_fb
+ [
f"\n Suggestions submitted: {len(action.suggestions)} "
f"(expected ~{len(ground_truth)})",
f" Approval: {'✅' if action.approved == expected_approved else '❌'} "
f"(got {'approved' if action.approved else 'rejected'}, "
f"expected {'approved' if expected_approved else 'rejected'})",
f"\n🏆 Total score: {total:.4f}",
]
)
return Reward(score=total, breakdown=breakdown, feedback=feedback)